PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MQQQ vs. QBTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MQQQ vs. QBTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ) and Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MQQQ achieves a 17.07% return, which is significantly higher than QBTX's -76.90% return.


MQQQ

1D
1.69%
1M
-7.53%
6M
15.18%
YTD
17.07%
1Y
39.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
36.13%

QBTX

1D
1.33%
1M
-42.34%
6M
-62.38%
YTD
-76.90%
1Y
-67.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$6.75M$11.55M$17.50M
$17.57M$16.05M$40.46M

MQQQ vs. QBTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MQQQ
Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF
17.07%62.70%
QBTX
Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF
-76.90%339.28%

Correlation

The correlation between MQQQ and QBTX is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2025

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MQQQ vs. QBTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MQQQ
MQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
MQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
MQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
MQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
MQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

QBTX
QBTX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
QBTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QBTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
QBTX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
QBTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
QBTX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MQQQ vs. QBTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ) and Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MQQQQBTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.08

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

-0.74

+2.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.17

-0.95

+5.12

MQQQ vs. QBTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is higher than the QBTX Sharpe Ratio of -0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MQQQ and QBTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MQQQ vs. QBTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MQQQ drawdown since its inception was -42.16%, smaller than the maximum QBTX drawdown of -95.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MQQQ and QBTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MQQQQBTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.16%

-95.48%

+53.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.23%

-95.48%

+70.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.97%

-94.67%

+78.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.39%

-60.34%

+52.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.24%

74.79%

-66.55%

Volatility

MQQQ vs. QBTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ) is 14.78%, while Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX) has a volatility of 57.40%. This indicates that MQQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QBTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MQQQQBTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.78%

57.40%

-42.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.38%

149.53%

-117.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.14%

219.66%

-180.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.75%

237.92%

-193.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.75%

237.92%

-193.17%

MQQQ vs. QBTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MQQQ and QBTX have an expense ratio of 1.30%.


Dividends

MQQQ vs. QBTX - Dividend Comparison

MQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than QBTX's 57.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
MQQQ
Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF
1.72%2.02%0.02%
QBTX
Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF
57.13%13.20%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MQQQ and QBTX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QBTX has higher volatility (57.40%) compared to MQQQ (14.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MQQQ dropped -42.16% vs QBTX's -95.48%.

On 1-year performance, MQQQ leads with 39.63% vs -67.82% for QBTX. Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. On volatility, MQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 14.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MQQQ has performed better with a 39.63% return vs -67.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MQQQ and QBTX have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.

QBTX has the higher dividend yield at 57.13%, compared with 1.72% for MQQQ.

MQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MQQQ and QBTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer