MPWR vs. CRDO
MPWR (Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.) and CRDO (Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd) are both stocks. Both operate in the Semiconductors industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 3 years, MPWR returned 38.39%/yr vs 130.87%/yr for CRDO. Their 0.54 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
MPWR vs. CRDO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MPWR achieves a 57.89% return, which is significantly higher than CRDO's 43.85% return.
MPWR
- 1D
- 8.35%
- 1M
- 7.08%
- 6M
- 27.30%
- YTD
- 57.89%
- 1Y
- 101.90%
- 3Y*
- 38.39%
- 5Y*
- 26.91%
- 10Y*
- 36.06%
- ALL TIME*
- 27.19%
CRDO
- 1D
- 2.94%
- 1M
- -20.11%
- 6M
- 65.22%
- YTD
- 43.85%
- 1Y
- 85.56%
- 3Y*
- 130.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 87.78%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.17B | $1.40B | $1.87B | |
| $1.37B | $1.27B | $1.35B |
MPWR vs. CRDO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MPWR Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. | 57.89% | 54.45% | -5.55% | 79.78% | -5.80% |
CRDO Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd | 43.85% | 114.09% | 245.20% | 46.28% | 10.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between MPWR and CRDO is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2022 | 0.54 |
The correlation between MPWR and CRDO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
MPWR:
$70.06B
CRDO:
$38.60B
MPWR:
$16.33
CRDO:
$2.50
MPWR:
87.33
CRDO:
82.94
MPWR:
1.10
CRDO:
0.07
MPWR:
21.32
CRDO:
29.34
MPWR:
18.03
CRDO:
19.33
MPWR:
$3.27B
CRDO:
$1.34B
MPWR:
$1.81B
CRDO:
$908.35M
MPWR:
$1.01B
CRDO:
$463.79M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MPWR vs. CRDO — Risk / Return Rank
MPWR
CRDO
MPWR vs. CRDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MPWR | CRDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.20 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.94 | 1.61 | +2.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.44 | 3.65 | +5.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MPWR vs. CRDO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MPWR drawdown since its inception was -72.27%, which is greater than CRDO's maximum drawdown of -62.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPWR and CRDO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MPWR | CRDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.27% | -62.04% | -10.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.99% | -53.59% | +27.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.65% | -61.05% | +9.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.49% | -31.58% | +16.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.71% | -19.39% | +1.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.83% | 23.55% | -12.72% |
Volatility
MPWR vs. CRDO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) is 18.57%, while Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) has a volatility of 29.83%. This indicates that MPWR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRDO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MPWR | CRDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.57% | 29.83% | -11.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.07% | 73.09% | -29.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.05% | 92.00% | -37.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.63% | 82.43% | -27.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.86% | 82.43% | -34.57% |
Dividends
MPWR vs. CRDO - Dividend Comparison
MPWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, while CRDO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRDO Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MPWR Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. | 0.50% | 0.69% | 0.85% | 0.63% | 0.85% | 0.49% | 0.55% | 0.90% | 1.03% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 1.26% |
Financials
MPWR vs. CRDO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MPWR vs. CRDO - Profitability Comparison
MPWR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 541.07M and revenue of 980.64M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.2%.
CRDO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported a gross profit of 298.07M and revenue of 437.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.2%.
MPWR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 303.89M and revenue of 980.64M, resulting in an operating margin of 31.0%.
CRDO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported an operating income of 155.85M and revenue of 437.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 35.7%.
MPWR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 257.30M and revenue of 980.64M, resulting in a net margin of 26.2%.
CRDO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported a net income of 169.10M and revenue of 437.00M, resulting in a net margin of 38.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MPWR and CRDO have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRDO has higher volatility (29.83%) compared to MPWR (18.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MPWR dropped -72.27% vs CRDO's -62.04%.
MPWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MPWR and CRDO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer