MPSAX vs. MGFAX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

MPSAX (MassMutual Inflation-Protected and Income Fund) and MGFAX (MassMutual Global Fund) are both mutual funds - MPSAX is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund managed by MassMutual, while MGFAX is a Global Equities fund managed by MassMutual. Over the past 10 years, MPSAX returned 3.37%/yr vs 12.54%/yr for MGFAX. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. MPSAX charges 1.02%/yr vs 1.41%/yr for MGFAX.

Performance

MPSAX vs. MGFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MassMutual Inflation-Protected and Income Fund (MPSAX) and MassMutual Global Fund (MGFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MPSAX achieves a 0.82% return, which is significantly lower than MGFAX's 10.33% return. Over the past 10 years, MPSAX has underperformed MGFAX with an annualized return of 3.37%, while MGFAX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.54% annualized return.

MPSAX

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.32%
• YTD: 0.82%
• 6M: 1.21%
• 1Y: 2.77%
• 3Y*: 2.93%
• 5Y*: 2.72%
• 10Y*: 3.37%

MGFAX

• 1D: 2.43%
• 1M: 5.26%
• YTD: 10.33%
• 6M: 10.18%
• 1Y: 22.68%
• 3Y*: 16.15%
• 5Y*: 7.57%
• 10Y*: 12.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MPSAX vs. MGFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MPSAX MassMutual Inflation-Protected and Income Fund	0.82%	5.50%	-0.02%	4.93%	-13.72%	20.31%	10.79%	7.67%	-1.86%	2.86%
MGFAX MassMutual Global Fund	10.33%	14.37%	15.01%	33.87%	-32.08%	19.60%	27.18%	30.67%	-14.19%	35.30%

Correlation

The correlation between MPSAX and MGFAX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2004	-0.07

The correlation between MPSAX and MGFAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MPSAX vs. MGFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MPSAX

MPSAX Risk / Return Rank: 13
MPSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
MPSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
MPSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
MPSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
MPSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 13

MGFAX

MGFAX Risk / Return Rank: 21
MGFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
MGFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
MGFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
MGFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
MGFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MPSAX vs. MGFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MassMutual Inflation-Protected and Income Fund (MPSAX) and MassMutual Global Fund (MGFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MPSAX	MGFAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.85	1.25	-0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.27	1.79	-0.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.23	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.42	1.32	+0.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.38	4.87	-1.49

MPSAX vs. MGFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MPSAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the MGFAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MPSAX and MGFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MPSAX vs. MGFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MPSAX drawdown since its inception was -19.35%, smaller than the maximum MGFAX drawdown of -62.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPSAX and MGFAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MPSAX	MGFAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.35%	-62.06%	+42.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.04%	-16.38%	+14.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.01%	-23.61%	+19.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.35%	-46.09%	+26.74%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.35%	-46.09%	+26.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.65%	0.00%	-8.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.19%	-13.57%	+7.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.86%	4.43%	-3.57%

Volatility

MPSAX vs. MGFAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MassMutual Inflation-Protected and Income Fund (MPSAX) is 1.18%, while MassMutual Global Fund (MGFAX) has a volatility of 7.92%. This indicates that MPSAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MPSAX	MGFAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.18%	7.92%	-6.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.44%	14.59%	-12.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.42%	17.29%	-13.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.76%	33.62%	-21.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.97%	27.64%	-18.67%

MPSAX vs. MGFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MPSAX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is lower than MGFAX's 1.41% expense ratio.

Dividends

MPSAX vs. MGFAX - Dividend Comparison

MPSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, less than MGFAX's 39.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MGFAX MassMutual Global Fund	39.57%	43.66%	16.85%	30.43%	28.11%	15.89%	5.05%	0.36%	27.78%	12.10%	3.75%	8.25%
MPSAX MassMutual Inflation-Protected and Income Fund	3.43%	3.51%	1.44%	2.47%	3.34%	18.54%	5.13%	1.59%	2.68%	2.34%	2.23%	0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MPSAX and MGFAX in my portfolio?

MPSAX and MGFAX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MPSAX or MGFAX?

MGFAX has higher volatility (7.92%) compared to MPSAX (1.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MPSAX dropped -19.35% vs MGFAX's -62.06%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MGFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.