MPRO vs. RAA

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

MPRO (Monarch ProCap ETF) and RAA (SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. MPRO is passively managed, while RAA is actively managed. Over the past year, MPRO returned 11.87% vs 17.36% for RAA. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MPRO charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for RAA.

Performance

MPRO vs. RAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Monarch ProCap ETF (MPRO) and SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF (RAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MPRO achieves a 6.89% return, which is significantly lower than RAA's 7.87% return.

MPRO

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: -0.86%
• 6M: 4.51%
• YTD: 6.89%
• 1Y: 11.87%
• 3Y*: 9.96%
• 5Y*: 5.64%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.55%

RAA

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 0.49%
• 6M: 5.16%
• YTD: 7.87%
• 1Y: 17.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MPRO Monarch ProCap ETF	$485.34K	$936.98K	$785.78K
RAA SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF	$1.45M	$1.38M	$1.58M

MPRO vs. RAA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MPRO Monarch ProCap ETF	6.89%	6.06%
RAA SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF	7.87%	11.92%

Correlation

The correlation between MPRO and RAA is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2025	0.63

The correlation between MPRO and RAA shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MPRO vs. RAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MPRO

MPRO Risk / Return Rank: 67
MPRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
MPRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
MPRO Omega Ratio Rank: 70
MPRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
MPRO Martin Ratio Rank: 64

RAA

RAA Risk / Return Rank: 69
RAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
RAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
RAA Omega Ratio Rank: 67
RAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
RAA Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MPRO vs. RAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch ProCap ETF (MPRO) and SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF (RAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MPRO	RAA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	1.67	+0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.62	2.30	+0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.30	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.10	2.95	-0.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.22	8.78	-0.56

MPRO vs. RAA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MPRO Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the RAA Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MPRO and RAA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MPRO vs. RAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MPRO drawdown since its inception was -14.51%, which is greater than RAA's maximum drawdown of -11.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPRO and RAA.

Drawdown Indicators

	MPRO	RAA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.51%	-11.96%	-2.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.67%	-5.91%	+0.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.64%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.99%	-3.25%	+2.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.37%	-1.65%	-1.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.45%	1.98%	-0.53%

Volatility

MPRO vs. RAA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Monarch ProCap ETF (MPRO) is 1.58%, while SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF (RAA) has a volatility of 2.58%. This indicates that MPRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MPRO	RAA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.58%	2.58%	-1.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.14%	8.12%	-2.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.71%	10.45%	-3.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.30%	12.62%	-3.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.16%	12.62%	-3.46%

MPRO vs. RAA - Expense Ratio Comparison

MPRO has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than RAA's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

MPRO vs. RAA - Dividend Comparison

MPRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, less than RAA's 2.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MPRO Monarch ProCap ETF	1.95%	1.93%	1.64%	1.40%	1.09%	0.95%
RAA SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF	2.13%	2.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MPRO and RAA in my portfolio?

MPRO and RAA have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MPRO or RAA?

RAA has higher volatility (2.58%) compared to MPRO (1.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MPRO dropped -14.51% vs RAA's -11.96%.

Which ETF is better, MPRO or RAA?

On 1-year performance, RAA leads with 17.36% vs 11.87% for MPRO. On fees, RAA is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, MPRO has been the lower-risk option at 1.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MPRO or RAA?

Over the 1-year period, RAA has performed better with a 17.36% return vs 11.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MPRO or RAA?

RAA is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for MPRO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MPRO or RAA?

RAA has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 1.95% for MPRO.

What is the main difference between MPRO and RAA?

They also come from different issuers: Monarch and SMI 3Fourteen. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for MPRO and 0.85% for RAA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MPRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.