MPRO vs. PTIN
MPRO (Monarch ProCap ETF) and PTIN (Pacer Trendpilot International ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds - MPRO tracks the Monarch ProCap Index while PTIN tracks the Pacer Trendpilot International Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MPRO returned 5.46%/yr vs 6.48%/yr for PTIN. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MPRO charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for PTIN.
Performance
MPRO vs. PTIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MPRO achieves a 5.93% return, which is significantly lower than PTIN's 16.79% return.
MPRO
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 5.93%
- 6M
- 5.81%
- 1Y
- 12.85%
- 3Y*
- 9.93%
- 5Y*
- 5.46%
- 10Y*
- —
PTIN
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 6.96%
- YTD
- 16.79%
- 6M
- 19.03%
- 1Y
- 33.04%
- 3Y*
- 13.60%
- 5Y*
- 6.48%
- 10Y*
- —
MPRO vs. PTIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MPRO Monarch ProCap ETF | 5.93% | 9.33% | 8.37% | 10.55% | -9.38% | 11.79% |
PTIN Pacer Trendpilot International ETF | 16.79% | 16.17% | 3.36% | 16.04% | -15.98% | 8.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between MPRO and PTIN is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2021 | 0.57 |
The correlation between MPRO and PTIN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
MPRO vs. PTIN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MPRO
PTIN
Communication Services
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
MPRO
PTIN
Healthcare
MPRO
PTIN
Technology
MPRO
PTIN
Consumer Cyclical
MPRO
PTIN
Real Estate
MPRO
PTIN
Financial Services
MPRO
PTIN
Consumer Defensive
MPRO
PTIN
Industrials
MPRO
PTIN
Basic Materials
MPRO
-
PTIN
Energy
MPRO
-
PTIN
Utilities
MPRO
-
PTIN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MPRO vs. PTIN — Risk / Return Rank
MPRO
PTIN
MPRO vs. PTIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch ProCap ETF (MPRO) and Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MPRO | PTIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.37 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 2.88 | -0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.99 | 10.99 | -2.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MPRO | PTIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | 2.04 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.45 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.52 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
MPRO vs. PTIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MPRO drawdown since its inception was -14.51%, smaller than the maximum PTIN drawdown of -21.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPRO and PTIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MPRO | PTIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.51% | -21.27% | +6.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.67% | -11.55% | +5.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.64% | -13.93% | +4.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.51% | -21.27% | +6.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.87% | -0.77% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.46% | -7.68% | +4.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.43% | 3.02% | -1.59% |
Volatility
MPRO vs. PTIN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Monarch ProCap ETF (MPRO) is 1.74%, while Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) has a volatility of 5.75%. This indicates that MPRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MPRO | PTIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.74% | 5.75% | -4.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.02% | 13.85% | -8.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.64% | 16.27% | -9.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.25% | 14.39% | -5.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.22% | 13.90% | -4.68% |
MPRO vs. PTIN - Expense Ratio Comparison
MPRO has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than PTIN's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
MPRO vs. PTIN - Dividend Comparison
MPRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than PTIN's 2.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MPRO Monarch ProCap ETF | 1.88% | 1.93% | 1.64% | 1.40% | 1.09% | 0.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PTIN Pacer Trendpilot International ETF | 2.17% | 2.53% | 2.67% | 2.09% | 0.41% | 2.38% | 0.77% | 0.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MPRO and PTIN have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTIN has higher volatility (5.75%) compared to MPRO (1.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MPRO dropped -14.51% vs PTIN's -21.27%.
On 5-year performance, PTIN leads with 6.48% vs 5.46% for MPRO. On fees, PTIN is cheaper at 0.66% per year. On volatility, MPRO has been the lower-risk option at 1.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PTIN has performed better with a 6.48% return vs 5.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PTIN is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for MPRO.
PTIN has the higher dividend yield at 2.17%, compared with 1.88% for MPRO.
MPRO tracks Monarch ProCap Index, while PTIN tracks Pacer Trendpilot International Index. They also come from different issuers: Monarch and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for MPRO and 0.66% for PTIN.
PTIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MPRO and PTIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer