MPRO vs. MFUL
MPRO (Monarch ProCap ETF) and MFUL (Mindful Conservative ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. MPRO is passively managed, while MFUL is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, MPRO returned 9.93%/yr vs 4.96%/yr for MFUL. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MPRO charges 1.17%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for MFUL.
Performance
MPRO vs. MFUL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MPRO achieves a 5.93% return, which is significantly higher than MFUL's 3.28% return.
MPRO
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 5.93%
- 6M
- 5.81%
- 1Y
- 12.85%
- 3Y*
- 9.93%
- 5Y*
- 5.46%
- 10Y*
- —
MFUL
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- 3.28%
- 6M
- 3.33%
- 1Y
- 7.13%
- 3Y*
- 4.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MPRO vs. MFUL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MPRO Monarch ProCap ETF | 5.93% | 9.33% | 8.37% | 10.55% | -9.38% | 1.34% |
MFUL Mindful Conservative ETF | 3.28% | 4.51% | 5.36% | 2.24% | -12.46% | -1.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between MPRO and MFUL is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2021 | 0.64 |
The correlation between MPRO and MFUL shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (all time) to 0.77 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MPRO vs. MFUL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MPRO
MFUL
Communication Services
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
MPRO
MFUL
Healthcare
MPRO
MFUL
Technology
MPRO
MFUL
Consumer Cyclical
MPRO
MFUL
Real Estate
MPRO
MFUL
Financial Services
MPRO
MFUL
Consumer Defensive
MPRO
MFUL
Industrials
MPRO
MFUL
Basic Materials
MPRO
-
MFUL
Energy
MPRO
-
MFUL
Utilities
MPRO
-
MFUL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MPRO vs. MFUL — Risk / Return Rank
MPRO
MFUL
MPRO vs. MFUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch ProCap ETF (MPRO) and Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MPRO | MFUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.35 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 2.13 | +0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.99 | 8.24 | +0.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MPRO | MFUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | 1.82 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.01 | +0.73 |
Drawdowns
MPRO vs. MFUL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MPRO drawdown since its inception was -14.51%, smaller than the maximum MFUL drawdown of -16.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPRO and MFUL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MPRO | MFUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.51% | -16.41% | +1.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.67% | -3.36% | -2.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.64% | -4.74% | -4.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.87% | -0.46% | -0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.46% | -9.50% | +6.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.43% | 0.87% | +0.56% |
Volatility
MPRO vs. MFUL - Volatility Comparison
Monarch ProCap ETF (MPRO) has a higher volatility of 1.74% compared to Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL) at 1.46%. This indicates that MPRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MPRO | MFUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.74% | 1.46% | +0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.02% | 3.23% | +1.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.64% | 3.93% | +2.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.25% | 4.24% | +5.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.22% | 4.24% | +4.98% |
MPRO vs. MFUL - Expense Ratio Comparison
MPRO has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than MFUL's 1.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
MPRO vs. MFUL - Dividend Comparison
MPRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than MFUL's 3.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFUL Mindful Conservative ETF | 3.01% | 3.31% | 2.59% | 5.00% | 0.29% | 0.00% |
MPRO Monarch ProCap ETF | 1.88% | 1.93% | 1.64% | 1.40% | 1.09% | 0.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MPRO and MFUL have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MPRO has higher volatility (1.74%) compared to MFUL (1.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MPRO dropped -14.51% vs MFUL's -16.41%.
On 3-year performance, MPRO leads with 9.93% vs 4.96% for MFUL. On fees, MFUL is cheaper at 1.10% per year. On volatility, MFUL has been the lower-risk option at 1.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MPRO has performed better with a 9.93% return vs 4.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MFUL is cheaper with a 1.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for MPRO.
MFUL has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 1.88% for MPRO.
They also come from different issuers: Monarch and Mohr Funds. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for MPRO and 1.10% for MFUL.
MPRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MPRO and MFUL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer