MPRO vs. MDAA
MPRO (Monarch ProCap ETF) and MDAA (Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. MPRO is passively managed, while MDAA is actively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MPRO charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for MDAA.
Performance
MPRO vs. MDAA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MPRO achieves a 5.93% return, which is significantly lower than MDAA's 22.13% return.
MPRO
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 5.93%
- 6M
- 5.81%
- 1Y
- 12.85%
- 3Y*
- 9.93%
- 5Y*
- 5.46%
- 10Y*
- —
MDAA
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 8.24%
- YTD
- 22.13%
- 6M
- 22.52%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MPRO vs. MDAA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MPRO Monarch ProCap ETF | 5.93% | 0.53% |
MDAA Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF | 22.13% | -0.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between MPRO and MDAA is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2025 | 0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MPRO vs. MDAA — Risk / Return Rank
MPRO
MDAA
MPRO vs. MDAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch ProCap ETF (MPRO) and Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF (MDAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MPRO | MDAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.99 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MPRO | MDAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 1.47 | -0.73 |
Drawdowns
MPRO vs. MDAA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MPRO drawdown since its inception was -14.51%, roughly equal to the maximum MDAA drawdown of -14.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPRO and MDAA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MPRO | MDAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.51% | -14.59% | +0.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.87% | -1.11% | +0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.46% | -2.93% | -0.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.43% | — | — |
Volatility
MPRO vs. MDAA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MPRO | MDAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.74% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.02% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.64% | 23.89% | -17.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.25% | 23.89% | -14.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.22% | 23.89% | -14.67% |
MPRO vs. MDAA - Expense Ratio Comparison
MPRO has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than MDAA's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
MPRO vs. MDAA - Dividend Comparison
MPRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, more than MDAA's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDAA Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF | 0.38% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MPRO Monarch ProCap ETF | 1.88% | 1.93% | 1.64% | 1.40% | 1.09% | 0.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MPRO and MDAA have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MDAA is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MDAA is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for MPRO.
MPRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 0.38% for MDAA.
They also come from different issuers: Monarch and Myriad. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for MPRO and 0.97% for MDAA.
Find the right allocation for MPRO and MDAA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer