MPLIX vs. MBAPX
MPLIX (Praxis International Index Fund) and MBAPX (Praxis Genesis Balanced Portfolio) are both mutual funds - MPLIX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Praxis Mutual Funds, while MBAPX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Praxis Mutual Funds. Over the past 10 years, MPLIX returned 9.92%/yr vs 7.74%/yr for MBAPX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MPLIX charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for MBAPX.
Performance
MPLIX vs. MBAPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MPLIX achieves a 16.64% return, which is significantly higher than MBAPX's 8.61% return. Over the past 10 years, MPLIX has outperformed MBAPX with an annualized return of 9.92%, while MBAPX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.74% annualized return.
MPLIX
- 1D
- 1.79%
- 1M
- 4.97%
- YTD
- 16.64%
- 6M
- 17.14%
- 1Y
- 33.68%
- 3Y*
- 18.76%
- 5Y*
- 9.29%
- 10Y*
- 9.92%
MBAPX
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 1.99%
- YTD
- 8.61%
- 6M
- 8.38%
- 1Y
- 19.11%
- 3Y*
- 12.30%
- 5Y*
- 5.47%
- 10Y*
- 7.74%
MPLIX vs. MBAPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MPLIX Praxis International Index Fund | 16.64% | 29.51% | 6.86% | 15.07% | -16.16% | 7.84% | 13.19% | 20.43% | -14.51% | 25.67% |
MBAPX Praxis Genesis Balanced Portfolio | 8.61% | 13.46% | 9.04% | 14.02% | -16.06% | 8.09% | 12.98% | 19.90% | -4.91% | 13.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between MPLIX and MBAPX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2010 | 0.89 |
The correlation between MPLIX and MBAPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MPLIX vs. MBAPX — Risk / Return Rank
MPLIX
MBAPX
MPLIX vs. MBAPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Praxis International Index Fund (MPLIX) and Praxis Genesis Balanced Portfolio (MBAPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MPLIX | MBAPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.42 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.78 | 2.97 | -0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.73 | 12.66 | -1.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MPLIX vs. MBAPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MPLIX drawdown since its inception was -35.25%, which is greater than MBAPX's maximum drawdown of -24.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPLIX and MBAPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MPLIX | MBAPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.25% | -24.54% | -10.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.79% | -6.41% | -5.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.35% | -10.32% | -3.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.78% | -24.54% | -5.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.25% | -24.54% | -10.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.06% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.37% | -3.70% | -4.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 1.50% | +1.55% |
Volatility
MPLIX vs. MBAPX - Volatility Comparison
Praxis International Index Fund (MPLIX) has a higher volatility of 6.54% compared to Praxis Genesis Balanced Portfolio (MBAPX) at 3.66%. This indicates that MPLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBAPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MPLIX | MBAPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.54% | 3.66% | +2.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.47% | 7.18% | +6.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.59% | 8.63% | +6.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.83% | 10.44% | +5.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.48% | 10.65% | +5.83% |
MPLIX vs. MBAPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MPLIX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than MBAPX's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
MPLIX vs. MBAPX - Dividend Comparison
MPLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, less than MBAPX's 4.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MBAPX Praxis Genesis Balanced Portfolio | 4.59% | 4.93% | 4.30% | 2.23% | 2.82% | 2.12% | 4.82% | 3.80% | 5.32% | 3.76% | 2.99% | 3.38% |
MPLIX Praxis International Index Fund | 2.84% | 3.32% | 2.97% | 3.26% | 2.09% | 2.49% | 1.48% | 2.37% | 2.49% | 1.71% | 1.93% | 2.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, MPLIX and MBAPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
MPLIX has higher volatility (6.54%) compared to MBAPX (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MPLIX dropped -35.25% vs MBAPX's -24.54%.
MBAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MPLIX and MBAPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer