PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MPIBX vs. DNLAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MPIBX vs. DNLAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Intermediate Bond Fund (MPIBX) and BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A (DNLAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MPIBX vs. DNLAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MPIBX
BNY Mellon Intermediate Bond Fund
100.08%6.53%2.69%5.26%-6.82%-1.04%5.58%5.89%0.35%1.80%
DNLAX
BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A
22.63%14.75%0.86%1.33%33.83%38.00%6.30%16.33%-17.78%13.69%

Returns By Period


MPIBX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DNLAX

1D
-0.55%
1M
-1.40%
YTD
22.63%
6M
31.46%
1Y
47.26%
3Y*
13.86%
5Y*
18.10%
10Y*
14.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MPIBX vs. DNLAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MPIBX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than DNLAX's 1.14% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MPIBX vs. DNLAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MPIBX

DNLAX
DNLAX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
DNLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
DNLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MPIBX vs. DNLAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Intermediate Bond Fund (MPIBX) and BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A (DNLAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MPIBX vs. DNLAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MPIBXDNLAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

Correlation

The correlation between MPIBX and DNLAX is -0.13. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

MPIBX vs. DNLAX - Dividend Comparison

MPIBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than DNLAX's 1.79% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MPIBX
BNY Mellon Intermediate Bond Fund
1.36%3.54%3.18%2.69%2.39%2.08%1.99%2.25%2.13%1.96%2.10%1.95%
DNLAX
BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A
1.79%2.19%7.75%12.54%9.80%5.04%0.91%1.95%1.53%0.40%1.26%0.98%

Drawdowns

MPIBX vs. DNLAX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MPIBXDNLAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.59%

Volatility

MPIBX vs. DNLAX - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MPIBXDNLAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.58%