PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MPIBX vs. DFCFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MPIBX vs. DFCFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Intermediate Bond Fund (MPIBX) and DFA Two-Year Fixed Income Portfolio (DFCFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MPIBX vs. DFCFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MPIBX
BNY Mellon Intermediate Bond Fund
100.08%6.53%2.69%5.26%-6.82%-1.04%5.58%5.89%0.35%1.80%
DFCFX
DFA Two-Year Fixed Income Portfolio
0.89%2.28%5.33%4.92%-3.28%8.60%0.57%2.65%1.78%0.92%

Returns By Period


MPIBX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DFCFX

1D
0.06%
1M
0.26%
YTD
0.89%
6M
1.87%
1Y
3.08%
3Y*
4.06%
5Y*
3.68%
10Y*
2.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MPIBX vs. DFCFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MPIBX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than DFCFX's 0.21% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MPIBX vs. DFCFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MPIBX

DFCFX
DFCFX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
DFCFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFCFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFCFX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
DFCFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFCFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MPIBX vs. DFCFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Intermediate Bond Fund (MPIBX) and DFA Two-Year Fixed Income Portfolio (DFCFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MPIBX vs. DFCFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MPIBXDFCFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.34

Correlation

The correlation between MPIBX and DFCFX is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

MPIBX vs. DFCFX - Dividend Comparison

MPIBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than DFCFX's 2.94% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MPIBX
BNY Mellon Intermediate Bond Fund
1.36%3.54%3.18%2.69%2.39%2.08%1.99%2.25%2.13%1.96%2.10%1.95%
DFCFX
DFA Two-Year Fixed Income Portfolio
2.94%2.16%4.90%3.43%1.32%8.29%0.67%2.22%1.87%1.22%0.79%0.53%

Drawdowns

MPIBX vs. DFCFX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MPIBXDFCFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-4.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.38%

Volatility

MPIBX vs. DFCFX - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MPIBXDFCFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.13%