MPGFX vs. FAMVX
Compare and contrast key facts about Mairs & Power Growth Fund (MPGFX) and FAM Value Fund (FAMVX).
MPGFX is managed by Mairs & Power. It was launched on Nov 7, 1958. FAMVX is managed by FAM. It was launched on Jan 2, 1987.
Performance
MPGFX vs. FAMVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MPGFX vs. FAMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MPGFX Mairs & Power Growth Fund | -3.78% | 10.55% | 19.61% | 27.70% | -21.28% | 29.42% | 16.80% | 28.40% | -4.27% | 16.54% |
FAMVX FAM Value Fund | -1.31% | 4.90% | 15.51% | 16.09% | -14.06% | 25.65% | 6.81% | 30.31% | -6.15% | 17.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MPGFX achieves a -3.78% return, which is significantly lower than FAMVX's -1.31% return. Over the past 10 years, MPGFX has outperformed FAMVX with an annualized return of 11.50%, while FAMVX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.72% annualized return.
MPGFX
- 1D
- 3.19%
- 1M
- -5.82%
- YTD
- -3.78%
- 6M
- -3.77%
- 1Y
- 11.34%
- 3Y*
- 14.84%
- 5Y*
- 8.75%
- 10Y*
- 11.50%
FAMVX
- 1D
- 2.57%
- 1M
- -6.90%
- YTD
- -1.31%
- 6M
- -1.84%
- 1Y
- 4.29%
- 3Y*
- 10.57%
- 5Y*
- 6.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MPGFX vs. FAMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MPGFX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than FAMVX's 1.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MPGFX vs. FAMVX — Risk / Return Rank
MPGFX
FAMVX
MPGFX vs. FAMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mairs & Power Growth Fund (MPGFX) and FAM Value Fund (FAMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MPGFX | FAMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.65 | 0.26 | +0.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.05 | 0.51 | +0.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.07 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.07 | 0.47 | +0.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.17 | 1.65 | +2.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MPGFX | FAMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 | 0.26 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.38 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.54 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.58 | -0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between MPGFX and FAMVX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MPGFX vs. FAMVX - Dividend Comparison
MPGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, less than FAMVX's 4.97% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MPGFX Mairs & Power Growth Fund | 4.66% | 4.48% | 3.84% | 2.34% | 8.80% | 8.13% | 8.81% | 7.39% | 8.76% | 9.47% | 5.84% | 7.92% |
FAMVX FAM Value Fund | 4.97% | 4.90% | 6.28% | 5.01% | 3.67% | 4.99% | 3.69% | 6.80% | 4.09% | 5.06% | 5.21% | 9.06% |
Drawdowns
MPGFX vs. FAMVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MPGFX drawdown since its inception was -61.00%, which is greater than FAMVX's maximum drawdown of -51.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPGFX and FAMVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MPGFX | FAMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.00% | -51.12% | -9.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.21% | -11.38% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.87% | -22.77% | -3.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.08% | -37.73% | +4.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.65% | -7.14% | +0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.75% | -6.45% | -8.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.88% | 3.25% | -0.37% |
Volatility
MPGFX vs. FAMVX - Volatility Comparison
Mairs & Power Growth Fund (MPGFX) has a higher volatility of 5.80% compared to FAM Value Fund (FAMVX) at 5.52%. This indicates that MPGFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAMVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MPGFX | FAMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.80% | 5.52% | +0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.85% | 10.21% | -0.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.89% | 17.91% | -0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.29% | 17.08% | +0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.07% | 18.15% | -0.08% |