MPC vs. VGT

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MPC (Marathon Petroleum Corporation) is a stock, while VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Over the past 10 years, MPC returned 26.22%/yr vs 25.62%/yr for VGT. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MPC vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MPC achieves a 65.66% return, which is significantly higher than VGT's 30.49% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MPC having a 26.22% annualized return and VGT not far behind at 25.62%.

MPC

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 2.90%
• YTD: 65.66%
• 6M: 41.68%
• 1Y: 73.48%
• 3Y*: 37.73%
• 5Y*: 36.41%
• 10Y*: 26.22%

VGT

• 1D: -0.88%
• 1M: 14.99%
• YTD: 30.49%
• 6M: 28.76%
• 1Y: 58.31%
• 3Y*: 33.33%
• 5Y*: 22.01%
• 10Y*: 25.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MPC vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MPC Marathon Petroleum Corporation	65.66%	19.17%	-4.06%	30.46%	86.62%	61.00%	-27.38%	6.05%	-8.23%	34.78%
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF	30.49%	21.77%	29.30%	52.66%	-29.70%	30.45%	46.04%	48.62%	2.46%	37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between MPC and VGT is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.10
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2011	0.34

The correlation between MPC and VGT shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MPC vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MPC

MPC Risk / Return Rank: 88
MPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
MPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
MPC Omega Ratio Rank: 87
MPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
MPC Martin Ratio Rank: 88

VGT

VGT Risk / Return Rank: 76
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 78
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MPC vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MPC	VGT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.36	2.85	-0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.90	3.54	-0.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.46	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.03	3.57	+0.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.65	11.41	-0.76
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MPC vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MPC Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MPC and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MPC	VGT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.36	2.85	-0.49
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.11	0.88	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.65	1.04	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	0.68	-0.12

Drawdowns

MPC vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MPC drawdown since its inception was -79.67%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPC and VGT.

Drawdown Indicators

	MPC	VGT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.67%	-54.63%	-25.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.33%	-16.40%	-1.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-44.75%	-27.23%	-17.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.75%	-35.07%	-9.68%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-79.67%	-35.07%	-44.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.06%	-2.35%	+2.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.36%	-7.95%	-9.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.92%	5.13%	+1.79%

Volatility

MPC vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) has a higher volatility of 10.91% compared to Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) at 6.51%. This indicates that MPC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MPC	VGT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.91%	6.51%	+4.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.73%	16.09%	+9.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.45%	20.55%	+10.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.04%	25.17%	+7.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.26%	24.60%	+15.66%

Dividends

MPC vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

MPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, more than VGT's 0.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MPC Marathon Petroleum Corporation	1.46%	2.29%	2.43%	2.07%	2.14%	3.63%	5.61%	3.52%	3.12%	2.30%	2.70%	2.20%
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF	0.31%	0.40%	0.60%	0.65%	0.91%	0.64%	0.82%	1.11%	1.29%	0.99%	1.31%	1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MPC and VGT in my portfolio?

MPC and VGT have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MPC or VGT?

MPC has higher volatility (10.91%) compared to VGT (6.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MPC dropped -79.67% vs VGT's -54.63%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.