PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MPBFX vs. WOBDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MPBFX vs. WOBDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Bond Fund (MPBFX) and JPMorgan Core Bond Fund (WOBDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MPBFX achieves a 0.21% return, which is significantly lower than WOBDX's 0.35% return. Over the past 10 years, MPBFX has underperformed WOBDX with an annualized return of 1.57%, while WOBDX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.91% annualized return.


MPBFX

1D
0.09%
1M
0.49%
YTD
0.21%
6M
0.06%
1Y
5.10%
3Y*
3.82%
5Y*
-0.10%
10Y*
1.57%

WOBDX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.34%
YTD
0.35%
6M
0.11%
1Y
5.34%
3Y*
4.21%
5Y*
0.52%
10Y*
1.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MPBFX vs. WOBDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MPBFX
BNY Mellon Bond Fund
0.21%7.20%1.08%5.48%-13.55%-1.50%7.87%8.82%-0.53%3.91%
WOBDX
JPMorgan Core Bond Fund
0.35%7.38%1.97%5.79%-12.35%-1.11%8.13%8.34%0.20%3.81%

Correlation

The correlation between MPBFX and WOBDX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2000

0.94

The correlation between MPBFX and WOBDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MPBFX vs. WOBDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MPBFX
MPBFX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
MPBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MPBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
MPBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
MPBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
MPBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

WOBDX
WOBDX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
WOBDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WOBDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
WOBDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
WOBDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
WOBDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MPBFX vs. WOBDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Bond Fund (MPBFX) and JPMorgan Core Bond Fund (WOBDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MPBFXWOBDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.36

1.36

0.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.03

2.03

-0.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.24

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

1.76

+0.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.47

5.29

+0.18

MPBFX vs. WOBDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MPBFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the WOBDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MPBFX and WOBDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MPBFXWOBDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

1.36

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

0.09

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

0.41

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

1.17

-0.33

Drawdowns

MPBFX vs. WOBDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MPBFX drawdown since its inception was -18.40%, which is greater than WOBDX's maximum drawdown of -16.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPBFX and WOBDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MPBFXWOBDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.40%

-16.65%

-1.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.87%

-2.99%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.18%

-5.96%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.40%

-16.65%

-1.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.40%

-16.65%

-1.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.54%

-1.70%

-0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.41%

-1.90%

-0.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

0.99%

-0.06%

Volatility

MPBFX vs. WOBDX - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Bond Fund (MPBFX) and JPMorgan Core Bond Fund (WOBDX) have volatilities of 1.35% and 1.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MPBFXWOBDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.35%

1.29%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.71%

2.76%

-0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.78%

3.89%

-0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.85%

5.69%

+0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.84%

4.71%

+0.13%

MPBFX vs. WOBDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MPBFX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than WOBDX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

MPBFX vs. WOBDX - Dividend Comparison

MPBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, less than WOBDX's 4.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MPBFX
BNY Mellon Bond Fund
3.82%3.82%3.70%3.17%2.86%2.33%4.64%2.87%3.00%2.89%3.12%2.77%
WOBDX
JPMorgan Core Bond Fund
4.07%3.97%3.95%3.51%2.68%2.82%4.00%3.23%2.91%2.88%2.84%2.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, MPBFX and WOBDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MPBFX has higher volatility (1.35%) compared to WOBDX (1.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MPBFX dropped -18.40% vs WOBDX's -16.65%.

MPBFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MPBFX and WOBDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer