MPBFX vs. DRGVX
Compare and contrast key facts about BNY Mellon Bond Fund (MPBFX) and BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I (DRGVX).
MPBFX is managed by BNY Mellon. It was launched on Oct 2, 2000. DRGVX is an actively managed fund by BNY Mellon. It was launched on May 31, 2001.
Performance
MPBFX vs. DRGVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MPBFX vs. DRGVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MPBFX BNY Mellon Bond Fund | -0.45% | 7.20% | 1.08% | 5.48% | -13.55% | -1.50% | 7.87% | 8.82% | -0.53% | 3.91% |
DRGVX BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I | 0.14% | 18.48% | 14.26% | 12.83% | 1.51% | 31.14% | 3.94% | 27.04% | -10.52% | 15.06% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MPBFX achieves a -0.45% return, which is significantly lower than DRGVX's 0.14% return. Over the past 10 years, MPBFX has underperformed DRGVX with an annualized return of 1.59%, while DRGVX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.72% annualized return.
MPBFX
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -2.14%
- YTD
- -0.45%
- 6M
- 0.48%
- 1Y
- 3.85%
- 3Y*
- 3.30%
- 5Y*
- -0.07%
- 10Y*
- 1.59%
DRGVX
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -6.15%
- YTD
- 0.14%
- 6M
- 5.03%
- 1Y
- 15.53%
- 3Y*
- 15.03%
- 5Y*
- 12.41%
- 10Y*
- 12.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MPBFX vs. DRGVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MPBFX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than DRGVX's 0.68% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MPBFX vs. DRGVX — Risk / Return Rank
MPBFX
DRGVX
MPBFX vs. DRGVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Bond Fund (MPBFX) and BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I (DRGVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MPBFX | DRGVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.95 | 0.99 | -0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.37 | 1.43 | -0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.21 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | 1.21 | +0.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.19 | 5.39 | -0.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MPBFX | DRGVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | 0.99 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | 0.80 | -0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | 0.68 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.60 | +0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between MPBFX and DRGVX is -0.14. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
MPBFX vs. DRGVX - Dividend Comparison
MPBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, less than DRGVX's 6.87% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MPBFX BNY Mellon Bond Fund | 3.53% | 3.82% | 3.70% | 3.17% | 2.86% | 2.33% | 4.64% | 2.87% | 3.00% | 2.89% | 3.12% | 2.77% |
DRGVX BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I | 6.87% | 6.88% | 6.87% | 5.31% | 7.99% | 21.73% | 2.85% | 3.52% | 17.87% | 10.95% | 2.89% | 16.07% |
Drawdowns
MPBFX vs. DRGVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MPBFX drawdown since its inception was -18.40%, smaller than the maximum DRGVX drawdown of -42.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPBFX and DRGVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MPBFX | DRGVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.40% | -42.60% | +24.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.58% | -12.22% | +9.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.40% | -17.01% | -1.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.40% | -42.60% | +24.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.18% | -6.65% | +3.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.40% | -4.39% | +1.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.90% | 2.74% | -1.84% |
Volatility
MPBFX vs. DRGVX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BNY Mellon Bond Fund (MPBFX) is 1.60%, while BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I (DRGVX) has a volatility of 4.03%. This indicates that MPBFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRGVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MPBFX | DRGVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.60% | 4.03% | -2.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.50% | 8.88% | -6.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.21% | 16.78% | -12.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.83% | 15.57% | -9.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.82% | 18.81% | -13.99% |