PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MOTI vs. FPXI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MOTI vs. FPXI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF (MOTI) and First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF (FPXI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOTI achieves a -10.36% return, which is significantly lower than FPXI's 38.27% return. Over the past 10 years, MOTI has underperformed FPXI with an annualized return of 6.45%, while FPXI has yielded a comparatively higher 13.96% annualized return.


MOTI

1D
-0.48%
1M
-5.79%
YTD
-10.36%
6M
-10.04%
1Y
-1.05%
3Y*
5.51%
5Y*
1.61%
10Y*
6.45%

FPXI

1D
0.15%
1M
9.00%
YTD
38.27%
6M
35.74%
1Y
47.85%
3Y*
29.62%
5Y*
4.34%
10Y*
13.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOTI vs. FPXI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MOTI
VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF
-10.36%25.01%1.94%10.18%-6.93%0.03%7.24%17.63%-13.92%34.27%
FPXI
First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF
38.27%26.37%12.62%9.56%-31.83%-15.73%71.50%33.69%-13.07%39.32%

Correlation

The correlation between MOTI and FPXI is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2015

0.65

The correlation between MOTI and FPXI shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MOTI vs. FPXI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MOTI
FPXI

Industrials

23.0%
21.5%

Consumer Defensive

20.9%
0.7%

Healthcare

13.0%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

12.6%
6.5%

Technology

10.6%
37.3%

Basic Materials

9.3%
13.2%

Communication Services

7.3%
2.2%

Financial Services

3.4%
4.2%

Energy

-

2.1%

Real Estate

-

0.5%

Utilities

-

1.0%

Industrials

MOTI
23.0%
FPXI
21.5%

Consumer Defensive

MOTI
20.9%
FPXI
0.7%

Healthcare

MOTI
13.0%
FPXI
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

MOTI
12.6%
FPXI
6.5%

Technology

MOTI
10.6%
FPXI
37.3%

Basic Materials

MOTI
9.3%
FPXI
13.2%

Communication Services

MOTI
7.3%
FPXI
2.2%

Financial Services

MOTI
3.4%
FPXI
4.2%

Energy

MOTI

-

FPXI
2.1%

Real Estate

MOTI

-

FPXI
0.5%

Utilities

MOTI

-

FPXI
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MOTI vs. FPXI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOTI
MOTI Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
MOTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOTI Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
MOTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOTI Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

FPXI
FPXI Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FPXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPXI Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FPXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPXI Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOTI vs. FPXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF (MOTI) and First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF (FPXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MOTIFPXIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.31

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.07

3.26

-3.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.16

10.87

-11.03

MOTI vs. FPXI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOTI Sharpe Ratio is -0.07, which is lower than the FPXI Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOTI and FPXI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MOTI vs. FPXI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOTI drawdown since its inception was -36.70%, smaller than the maximum FPXI drawdown of -55.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOTI and FPXI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MOTIFPXIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.70%

-55.78%

+19.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.61%

-14.77%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.35%

-20.58%

+4.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.77%

-50.75%

+21.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.70%

-55.78%

+19.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.61%

-5.49%

-10.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.15%

-20.17%

+11.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.51%

4.42%

+2.09%

Volatility

MOTI vs. FPXI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF (MOTI) is 3.06%, while First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF (FPXI) has a volatility of 13.69%. This indicates that MOTI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FPXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MOTIFPXIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.06%

13.69%

-10.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.08%

23.38%

-12.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.41%

26.62%

-12.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.54%

22.31%

-4.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.82%

21.46%

-3.64%

MOTI vs. FPXI - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOTI has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than FPXI's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

MOTI vs. FPXI - Dividend Comparison

MOTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, more than FPXI's 0.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FPXI
First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF
0.58%0.70%0.93%0.71%1.13%0.71%0.18%0.67%1.75%0.75%2.09%1.34%
MOTI
VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF
3.60%3.22%4.79%2.34%3.27%4.67%2.14%3.90%3.73%8.87%1.33%0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


MOTI and FPXI have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FPXI has higher volatility (13.69%) compared to MOTI (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOTI dropped -36.70% vs FPXI's -55.78%.

On 10-year performance, FPXI leads with 13.96% vs 6.45% for MOTI. On fees, MOTI is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, MOTI has been the lower-risk option at 3.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FPXI has performed better with a 13.96% return vs 6.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MOTI is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FPXI.

MOTI has the higher dividend yield at 3.60%, compared with 0.58% for FPXI.

MOTI tracks Morningstar Global ex-US Moat Focus Index, while FPXI tracks IPOX International Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for MOTI and 0.70% for FPXI.

FPXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MOTI and FPXI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer