PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MOTG vs. VTV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MOTG vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOTG achieves a 6.17% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 18.44% return.


MOTG

1D
1.36%
1M
6.68%
6M
3.28%
YTD
6.17%
1Y
12.74%
3Y*
14.85%
5Y*
7.49%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.96%

VTV

1D
1.30%
1M
2.14%
6M
11.73%
YTD
18.44%
1Y
28.99%
3Y*
18.34%
5Y*
12.61%
10Y*
12.61%
ALL TIME*
9.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$14.07K$24.07K$42.57K
$668.29M$673.37M$627.33M

MOTG vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MOTG
VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF
6.17%26.06%9.31%11.00%-11.34%14.68%16.06%30.43%-3.89%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
18.44%15.27%15.95%9.32%-2.09%26.53%2.33%25.66%-5.53%

Correlation

The correlation between MOTG and VTV is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2018

0.79

The correlation between MOTG and VTV shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MOTG vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MOTG
VTV

Industrials

25.3%
14.3%

Technology

18.8%
15.3%

Consumer Defensive

17.7%
8.7%

Healthcare

16.0%
15.2%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
3.9%

Financial Services

7.0%
22.4%

Communication Services

5.6%
2.9%

Basic Materials

1.2%
3.0%

Energy

-

6.9%

Real Estate

-

2.5%

Utilities

-

4.8%

Industrials

MOTG
25.3%
VTV
14.3%

Technology

MOTG
18.8%
VTV
15.3%

Consumer Defensive

MOTG
17.7%
VTV
8.7%

Healthcare

MOTG
16.0%
VTV
15.2%

Consumer Cyclical

MOTG
8.5%
VTV
3.9%

Financial Services

MOTG
7.0%
VTV
22.4%

Communication Services

MOTG
5.6%
VTV
2.9%

Basic Materials

MOTG
1.2%
VTV
3.0%

Energy

MOTG

-

VTV
6.9%

Real Estate

MOTG

-

VTV
2.5%

Utilities

MOTG

-

VTV
4.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MOTG vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MOTG
MOTG Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
MOTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOTG Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
MOTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOTG Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MOTG vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MOTGVTVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.51

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.02

4.59

-3.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.88

17.73

-14.85

MOTG vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOTG Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is lower than the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOTG and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MOTG vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOTG drawdown since its inception was -31.82%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOTG and VTV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MOTGVTVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.82%

-59.27%

+27.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.56%

-6.35%

-6.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.59%

-14.52%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.29%

-17.04%

-7.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.96%

-7.81%

+2.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.43%

1.64%

+2.79%

Volatility

MOTG vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) has a higher volatility of 3.57% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 2.83%. This indicates that MOTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MOTGVTVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.57%

2.83%

+0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.64%

7.78%

+3.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.26%

10.34%

+3.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.93%

13.82%

+2.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.76%

16.62%

+1.14%

MOTG vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOTG has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

MOTG vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

MOTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.72%, more than VTV's 1.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MOTG
VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF
16.72%17.75%5.60%1.86%3.64%5.88%2.96%3.91%0.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.83%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


MOTG and VTV have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MOTG has higher volatility (3.57%) compared to VTV (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOTG dropped -31.82% vs VTV's -59.27%.

On 5-year performance, VTV leads with 12.61% vs 7.49% for MOTG. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VTV has performed better with a 12.61% return vs 7.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for MOTG.

MOTG has the higher dividend yield at 16.72%, compared with 1.83% for VTV.

MOTG is categorized as Global Equities, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. MOTG tracks Morningstar Global Wide Moat Focus Index, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for MOTG and 0.04% for VTV.

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MOTG and VTV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer