MOTG vs. VEGA
MOTG (VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF) and VEGA (AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF) are both Global Equities funds. MOTG is passively managed, while VEGA is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, MOTG returned 5.99%/yr vs 6.66%/yr for VEGA. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MOTG charges 0.52%/yr vs 2.02%/yr for VEGA.
Performance
MOTG vs. VEGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MOTG achieves a -2.75% return, which is significantly lower than VEGA's 5.58% return.
MOTG
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -2.97%
- YTD
- -2.75%
- 6M
- -3.04%
- 1Y
- 5.87%
- 3Y*
- 12.00%
- 5Y*
- 5.99%
- 10Y*
- —
VEGA
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- YTD
- 5.58%
- 6M
- 4.66%
- 1Y
- 15.22%
- 3Y*
- 13.21%
- 5Y*
- 6.66%
- 10Y*
- 7.92%
MOTG vs. VEGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOTG VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF | -2.75% | 26.06% | 9.31% | 11.00% | -11.34% | 14.68% | 16.06% | 30.43% | -3.89% |
VEGA AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF | 5.58% | 15.83% | 11.20% | 15.12% | -15.02% | 12.36% | 8.37% | 19.29% | -3.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between MOTG and VEGA is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2018 | 0.80 |
The correlation between MOTG and VEGA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MOTG vs. VEGA — Risk / Return Rank
MOTG
VEGA
MOTG vs. VEGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) and AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF (VEGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MOTG | VEGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.30 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.47 | 2.23 | -1.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.45 | 9.72 | -8.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MOTG vs. VEGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOTG drawdown since its inception was -31.82%, which is greater than VEGA's maximum drawdown of -28.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOTG and VEGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOTG | VEGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.82% | -28.37% | -3.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.56% | -6.86% | -5.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.31% | -11.62% | -3.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.29% | -22.78% | -1.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.08% | -1.93% | -6.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.96% | -3.78% | -1.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.06% | 1.57% | +2.49% |
Volatility
MOTG vs. VEGA - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) and AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF (VEGA) have volatilities of 3.88% and 3.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MOTG | VEGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.88% | 3.85% | +0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.60% | 8.05% | +3.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.13% | 9.59% | +4.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.90% | 12.36% | +3.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.83% | 12.74% | +5.09% |
MOTG vs. VEGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
MOTG has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than VEGA's 2.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
MOTG vs. VEGA - Dividend Comparison
MOTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.25%, more than VEGA's 1.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOTG VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF | 18.25% | 17.75% | 5.60% | 1.86% | 3.64% | 5.88% | 2.96% | 3.91% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VEGA AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF | 1.27% | 1.34% | 1.05% | 1.12% | 1.89% | 0.55% | 0.28% | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MOTG and VEGA have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MOTG has higher volatility (3.88%) compared to VEGA (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOTG dropped -31.82% vs VEGA's -28.37%.
On 5-year performance, VEGA leads with 6.66% vs 5.99% for MOTG. On fees, MOTG is cheaper at 0.52% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VEGA has performed better with a 6.66% return vs 5.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MOTG is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 2.02% for VEGA.
MOTG has the higher dividend yield at 18.25%, compared with 1.27% for VEGA.
They also come from different issuers: VanEck and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for MOTG and 2.02% for VEGA.
VEGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MOTG and VEGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer