MOTG vs. AVGV

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

MOTG (VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF) and AVGV (Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF) are both Global Equities funds. MOTG is passively managed, while AVGV is actively managed. Over the past year, MOTG returned 5.87% vs 33.82% for AVGV. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MOTG charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for AVGV.

Performance

MOTG vs. AVGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) and Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOTG achieves a -2.75% return, which is significantly lower than AVGV's 16.44% return.

MOTG

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: -2.97%
• YTD: -2.75%
• 6M: -3.04%
• 1Y: 5.87%
• 3Y*: 12.00%
• 5Y*: 5.99%
• 10Y*: —

AVGV

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 0.71%
• YTD: 16.44%
• 6M: 15.20%
• 1Y: 33.82%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOTG vs. AVGV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MOTG VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF	-2.75%	26.06%	9.31%	3.92%
AVGV Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF	16.44%	22.57%	11.26%	11.88%

Correlation

The correlation between MOTG and AVGV is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2023	0.84

The correlation between MOTG and AVGV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

MOTG vs. AVGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MOTG	AVGV
Industrials	26.3%	16.2%
Technology	19.3%	12.1%
Consumer Defensive	16.8%	5.2%
Healthcare	14.1%	4.5%
Consumer Cyclical	9.5%	14.7%
Communication Services	6.6%	5.0%
Financial Services	6.3%	21.3%
Basic Materials	1.1%	7.2%
Energy	-	12.4%
Real Estate	-	0.7%
Utilities	-	0.7%

Return for Risk

MOTG vs. AVGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOTG

MOTG Risk / Return Rank: 15
MOTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
MOTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
MOTG Omega Ratio Rank: 14
MOTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
MOTG Martin Ratio Rank: 16

AVGV

AVGV Risk / Return Rank: 86
AVGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
AVGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
AVGV Omega Ratio Rank: 84
AVGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
AVGV Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOTG vs. AVGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) and Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MOTG	AVGV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.42	2.54	-2.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.69	3.52	-2.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.45	-0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.47	4.18	-3.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.45	16.23	-14.78

MOTG vs. AVGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOTG Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the AVGV Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOTG and AVGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MOTG vs. AVGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOTG drawdown since its inception was -31.82%, which is greater than AVGV's maximum drawdown of -17.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOTG and AVGV.

Drawdown Indicators

	MOTG	AVGV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.82%	-17.03%	-14.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.56%	-8.12%	-4.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.31%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.08%	-2.02%	-6.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.96%	-2.27%	-2.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.06%	2.09%	+1.97%

Volatility

MOTG vs. AVGV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) is 3.88%, while Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV) has a volatility of 4.54%. This indicates that MOTG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MOTG	AVGV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.88%	4.54%	-0.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.60%	10.45%	+1.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.13%	13.40%	+0.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.90%	15.02%	+0.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.83%	15.02%	+2.81%

MOTG vs. AVGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOTG has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than AVGV's 0.26% expense ratio.

Dividends

MOTG vs. AVGV - Dividend Comparison

MOTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.25%, more than AVGV's 2.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AVGV Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF	2.49%	1.98%	2.32%	1.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MOTG VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF	18.25%	17.75%	5.60%	1.86%	3.64%	5.88%	2.96%	3.91%	0.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MOTG and AVGV in my portfolio?

MOTG and AVGV have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MOTG or AVGV?

AVGV has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to MOTG (3.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOTG dropped -31.82% vs AVGV's -17.03%.

Which ETF is better, MOTG or AVGV?

On 1-year performance, AVGV leads with 33.82% vs 5.87% for MOTG. On fees, AVGV is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, MOTG has been the lower-risk option at 3.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MOTG or AVGV?

Over the 1-year period, AVGV has performed better with a 33.82% return vs 5.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MOTG or AVGV?

AVGV is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for MOTG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MOTG or AVGV?

MOTG has the higher dividend yield at 18.25%, compared with 2.49% for AVGV.

What is the main difference between MOTG and AVGV?

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for MOTG and 0.26% for AVGV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.