PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MOTG vs. AVDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MOTG vs. AVDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOTG achieves a -1.12% return, which is significantly lower than AVDV's 16.64% return.


MOTG

1D
-1.46%
1M
0.44%
YTD
-1.12%
6M
0.57%
1Y
9.30%
3Y*
12.83%
5Y*
6.27%
10Y*

AVDV

1D
0.52%
1M
3.19%
YTD
16.64%
6M
20.05%
1Y
44.34%
3Y*
28.61%
5Y*
13.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOTG vs. AVDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MOTG
VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF
-1.12%26.06%9.31%11.00%-11.34%14.68%16.06%10.39%
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
16.64%49.37%8.67%16.85%-11.47%15.80%5.01%12.05%

Correlation

The correlation between MOTG and AVDV is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.80

The correlation between MOTG and AVDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

MOTG vs. AVDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MOTG
AVDV

Industrials

26.4%
21.3%

Consumer Defensive

17.3%
3.4%

Technology

17.1%
6.4%

Healthcare

13.9%
2.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
14.4%

Financial Services

7.3%
13.7%

Communication Services

6.7%
2.0%

Basic Materials

1.1%
22.5%

Energy

-

10.8%

Real Estate

-

1.1%

Utilities

-

1.7%

Industrials

MOTG
26.4%
AVDV
21.3%

Consumer Defensive

MOTG
17.3%
AVDV
3.4%

Technology

MOTG
17.1%
AVDV
6.4%

Healthcare

MOTG
13.9%
AVDV
2.1%

Consumer Cyclical

MOTG
10.3%
AVDV
14.4%

Financial Services

MOTG
7.3%
AVDV
13.7%

Communication Services

MOTG
6.7%
AVDV
2.0%

Basic Materials

MOTG
1.1%
AVDV
22.5%

Energy

MOTG

-

AVDV
10.8%

Real Estate

MOTG

-

AVDV
1.1%

Utilities

MOTG

-

AVDV
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MOTG vs. AVDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOTG
MOTG Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
MOTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOTG Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
MOTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOTG Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

AVDV
AVDV Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
AVDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
AVDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOTG vs. AVDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MOTGAVDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.52

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.74

3.38

-2.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.52

13.70

-11.18

MOTG vs. AVDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOTG Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is lower than the AVDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOTG and AVDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MOTGAVDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

2.87

-2.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.80

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.80

-0.17

Drawdowns

MOTG vs. AVDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOTG drawdown since its inception was -31.82%, smaller than the maximum AVDV drawdown of -43.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOTG and AVDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MOTGAVDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.82%

-43.01%

+11.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.56%

-13.19%

+0.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.31%

-14.17%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.29%

-28.08%

+3.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.54%

-0.83%

-5.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.95%

-6.77%

+1.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.70%

3.24%

+0.46%

Volatility

MOTG vs. AVDV - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) have volatilities of 4.58% and 4.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MOTGAVDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.58%

4.79%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.23%

13.07%

-1.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.85%

15.54%

-1.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.86%

17.29%

-1.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.85%

19.72%

-1.87%

MOTG vs. AVDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOTG has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than AVDV's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

MOTG vs. AVDV - Dividend Comparison

MOTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.95%, more than AVDV's 2.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
2.73%3.05%4.31%3.29%3.17%2.39%1.67%0.36%0.00%
MOTG
VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF
17.95%17.75%5.60%1.86%3.64%5.88%2.96%3.91%0.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


MOTG and AVDV have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVDV has higher volatility (4.79%) compared to MOTG (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOTG dropped -31.82% vs AVDV's -43.01%.

On 5-year performance, AVDV leads with 13.84% vs 6.27% for MOTG. On fees, AVDV is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, MOTG has been the lower-risk option at 4.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AVDV has performed better with a 13.84% return vs 6.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVDV is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for MOTG.

MOTG has the higher dividend yield at 17.95%, compared with 2.73% for AVDV.

MOTG is categorized as Global Equities, while AVDV is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for MOTG and 0.36% for AVDV.

AVDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MOTG and AVDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer