PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MORT vs. NLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MORT vs. NLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Mortgage REIT Income ETF (MORT) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MORT achieves a -2.10% return, which is significantly lower than NLR's 6.14% return. Over the past 10 years, MORT has underperformed NLR with an annualized return of 2.27%, while NLR has yielded a comparatively higher 13.66% annualized return.


MORT

1D
-1.29%
1M
-4.89%
YTD
-2.10%
6M
-2.31%
1Y
10.79%
3Y*
8.07%
5Y*
-2.36%
10Y*
2.27%

NLR

1D
-4.59%
1M
-8.11%
YTD
6.14%
6M
1.51%
1Y
36.84%
3Y*
35.11%
5Y*
21.94%
10Y*
13.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MORT vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MORT
VanEck Vectors Mortgage REIT Income ETF
-2.10%12.17%0.14%14.74%-26.92%15.95%-22.39%21.26%-4.45%18.88%
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
6.14%56.50%14.26%36.67%2.29%13.63%3.49%0.20%4.94%8.25%

Correlation

The correlation between MORT and NLR is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2011

0.41

The correlation between MORT and NLR shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.42 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MORT vs. NLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MORT
NLR

Real Estate

96.7%

-

Financial Services

3.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

46.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

15.1%

Technology

-

1.5%

Utilities

-

37.4%

Real Estate

MORT
96.7%
NLR

-

Financial Services

MORT
3.0%
NLR

-

Basic Materials

MORT

-

NLR

-

Communication Services

MORT

-

NLR

-

Consumer Cyclical

MORT

-

NLR

-

Consumer Defensive

MORT

-

NLR

-

Energy

MORT

-

NLR
46.0%

Healthcare

MORT

-

NLR

-

Industrials

MORT

-

NLR
15.1%

Technology

MORT

-

NLR
1.5%

Utilities

MORT

-

NLR
37.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MORT vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MORT
MORT Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
MORT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MORT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
MORT Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
MORT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
MORT Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

NLR
NLR Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
NLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
NLR Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
NLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
NLR Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MORT vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Mortgage REIT Income ETF (MORT) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MORTNLRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.17

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.76

1.43

-0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.12

2.93

-0.81

MORT vs. NLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MORT Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is comparable to the NLR Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MORT and NLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MORTNLRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

0.88

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.10

0.75

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

0.57

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.18

-0.02

Drawdowns

MORT vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MORT drawdown since its inception was -70.13%, which is greater than NLR's maximum drawdown of -65.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MORT and NLR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MORTNLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.13%

-65.05%

-5.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.27%

-25.80%

+11.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.98%

-30.48%

+8.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.73%

-30.48%

-12.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.13%

-34.35%

-35.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.25%

-19.80%

-3.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.31%

-35.72%

+20.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.11%

12.61%

-7.50%

Volatility

MORT vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Mortgage REIT Income ETF (MORT) is 3.67%, while VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) has a volatility of 13.18%. This indicates that MORT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MORTNLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

13.18%

-9.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.80%

32.83%

-20.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.59%

42.32%

-25.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.70%

29.24%

-5.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.85%

24.02%

+4.83%

MORT vs. NLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

MORT has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than NLR's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

MORT vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison

MORT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.30%, more than NLR's 2.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MORT
VanEck Vectors Mortgage REIT Income ETF
13.30%12.76%11.55%12.18%13.09%8.21%8.11%7.36%8.19%7.82%8.21%9.91%
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
2.40%2.55%0.76%4.54%2.02%1.99%2.23%2.21%3.91%4.86%3.62%3.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


MORT and NLR have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NLR has higher volatility (13.18%) compared to MORT (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MORT dropped -70.13% vs NLR's -65.05%.

On 10-year performance, NLR leads with 13.66% vs 2.27% for MORT. On fees, MORT is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, MORT has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, NLR has performed better with a 13.66% return vs 2.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MORT is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for NLR.

MORT has the higher dividend yield at 13.30%, compared with 2.40% for NLR.

MORT is categorized as REIT, while NLR is Alternative Energy Equities. MORT tracks MVIS Global Mortgage REITs Index, while NLR tracks MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for MORT and 0.56% for NLR.

NLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MORT and NLR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer