MOOD vs. VRIG

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

MOOD (Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF) and VRIG (Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MOOD is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Relative Sentiment, while VRIG is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Invesco. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, MOOD returned 20.20%/yr vs 5.94%/yr for VRIG. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MOOD charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for VRIG.

Performance

MOOD vs. VRIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) and Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOOD achieves a 14.12% return, which is significantly higher than VRIG's 1.91% return.

MOOD

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: 1.18%
• YTD: 14.12%
• 6M: 15.59%
• 1Y: 33.44%
• 3Y*: 20.20%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VRIG

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.31%
• YTD: 1.91%
• 6M: 2.18%
• 1Y: 4.93%
• 3Y*: 5.94%
• 5Y*: 4.44%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOOD vs. VRIG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF	14.12%	30.39%	12.53%	12.56%	-3.31%
VRIG Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF	1.91%	5.05%	6.81%	7.37%	1.63%

Correlation

The correlation between MOOD and VRIG is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2022	0.16

MOOD vs. VRIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MOOD	VRIG
Technology	27.6%	0.4%
Financial Services	15.7%	23.3%
Industrials	12.6%	0.0%
Consumer Cyclical	9.5%	3.0%
Healthcare	8.4%	-
Communication Services	7.9%	-
Consumer Defensive	5.1%	0.7%
Basic Materials	4.4%	0.8%
Energy	3.7%	-
Utilities	2.7%	0.1%
Real Estate	2.5%	0.3%

Return for Risk

MOOD vs. VRIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOOD

MOOD Risk / Return Rank: 77
MOOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
MOOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
MOOD Omega Ratio Rank: 86
MOOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
MOOD Martin Ratio Rank: 67

VRIG

VRIG Risk / Return Rank: 99
VRIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
VRIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
VRIG Omega Ratio Rank: 99
VRIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
VRIG Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOOD vs. VRIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) and Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MOOD	VRIG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.32	10.00	-7.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.76	24.17	-21.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	5.25	-3.80
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.46	61.96	-58.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.68	315.58	-304.90

MOOD vs. VRIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOOD Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is lower than the VRIG Sharpe Ratio of 10.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOOD and VRIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MOOD vs. VRIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOOD drawdown since its inception was -14.34%, which is greater than VRIG's maximum drawdown of -13.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOOD and VRIG.

Drawdown Indicators

	MOOD	VRIG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.34%	-13.04%	-1.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.71%	-0.08%	-9.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.71%	-0.78%	-8.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-2.28%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.86%	0.00%	-0.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.32%	-0.27%	-2.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.14%	0.02%	+3.12%

Volatility

MOOD vs. VRIG - Volatility Comparison

Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) has a higher volatility of 4.19% compared to Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG) at 0.10%. This indicates that MOOD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MOOD	VRIG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.19%	0.10%	+4.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.73%	0.35%	+12.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.49%	0.50%	+13.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.13%	1.29%	+10.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.13%	3.79%	+8.34%

MOOD vs. VRIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOOD has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than VRIG's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

MOOD vs. VRIG - Dividend Comparison

MOOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than VRIG's 4.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF	0.35%	0.40%	1.33%	1.34%	1.43%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VRIG Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF	4.79%	4.99%	6.09%	5.97%	2.39%	0.78%	1.57%	3.12%	2.89%	2.31%	0.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MOOD and VRIG in my portfolio?

MOOD and VRIG have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MOOD or VRIG?

MOOD has higher volatility (4.19%) compared to VRIG (0.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOOD dropped -14.34% vs VRIG's -13.04%.

Which ETF is better, MOOD or VRIG?

On 3-year performance, MOOD leads with 20.20% vs 5.94% for VRIG. On fees, VRIG is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, VRIG has been the lower-risk option at 0.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MOOD or VRIG?

Over the 3-year period, MOOD has performed better with a 20.20% return vs 5.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MOOD or VRIG?

VRIG is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for MOOD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MOOD or VRIG?

VRIG has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 0.35% for MOOD.

What is the main difference between MOOD and VRIG?

MOOD is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while VRIG is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Relative Sentiment and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for MOOD and 0.30% for VRIG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VRIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.00 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.