MOOD vs. VFLO

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

MOOD (Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF) and VFLO (VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MOOD is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Alpha Architect, while VFLO is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Victory U.S. Large Cap Free Cash Flow Index. MOOD is actively managed, while VFLO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MOOD returned 19.14%/yr vs 24.37%/yr for VFLO. Their 0.56 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MOOD charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for VFLO.

Performance

MOOD vs. VFLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) and VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOOD achieves a 13.27% return, which is significantly lower than VFLO's 26.80% return.

MOOD

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.15%
• 6M: 5.83%
• YTD: 13.27%
• 1Y: 31.25%
• 3Y*: 19.14%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.16%

VFLO

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: 7.67%
• 6M: 26.51%
• YTD: 26.80%
• 1Y: 45.07%
• 3Y*: 24.37%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 26.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF	$594.91K	$566.29K	$735.34K
VFLO VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF	$86.49M	$72.10M	$51.24M

MOOD vs. VFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF	13.27%	30.39%	12.53%	3.52%
VFLO VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF	26.80%	17.51%	21.83%	15.05%

Correlation

The correlation between MOOD and VFLO is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2023	0.56

The correlation between MOOD and VFLO shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MOOD vs. VFLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MOOD	VFLO
Technology	33.5%	30.4%
Financial Services	12.4%	0.0%
Industrials	9.9%	0.0%
Consumer Cyclical	9.0%	10.8%
Healthcare	9.0%	21.6%
Communication Services	8.6%	4.4%
Basic Materials	5.9%	7.0%
Consumer Defensive	4.4%	0.0%
Energy	3.0%	22.6%
Utilities	2.2%	3.3%
Real Estate	2.1%	0.0%

Return for Risk

MOOD vs. VFLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MOOD

MOOD Risk / Return Rank: 84
MOOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
MOOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
MOOD Omega Ratio Rank: 90
MOOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
MOOD Martin Ratio Rank: 78

VFLO

VFLO Risk / Return Rank: 96
VFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
VFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
VFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 94
VFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
VFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MOOD vs. VFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) and VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MOOD	VFLO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.14	2.94	-0.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.57	4.10	-1.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.52	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.23	7.03	-3.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.79	23.62	-13.84

MOOD vs. VFLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOOD Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the VFLO Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOOD and VFLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MOOD vs. VFLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOOD drawdown since its inception was -14.34%, smaller than the maximum VFLO drawdown of -17.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOOD and VFLO.

Drawdown Indicators

	MOOD	VFLO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.34%	-17.79%	+3.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.71%	-6.44%	-3.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.71%	-17.79%	+8.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.08%	-0.96%	-1.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.30%	-2.43%	+0.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.20%	1.91%	+1.29%

Volatility

MOOD vs. VFLO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) is 2.45%, while VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) has a volatility of 4.11%. This indicates that MOOD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MOOD	VFLO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.45%	4.11%	-1.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.23%	12.12%	+0.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.69%	15.64%	-0.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.09%	15.98%	-3.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.09%	15.98%	-3.89%

MOOD vs. VFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOOD has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than VFLO's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

MOOD vs. VFLO - Dividend Comparison

MOOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than VFLO's 1.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF	0.36%	0.40%	1.33%	1.34%	1.43%
VFLO VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF	1.07%	1.60%	1.20%	0.71%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MOOD and VFLO in my portfolio?

MOOD and VFLO have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MOOD or VFLO?

VFLO has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to MOOD (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOOD dropped -14.34% vs VFLO's -17.79%.

Which ETF is better, MOOD or VFLO?

On 3-year performance, VFLO leads with 24.37% vs 19.14% for MOOD. On fees, VFLO is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, MOOD has been the lower-risk option at 2.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MOOD or VFLO?

Over the 3-year period, VFLO has performed better with a 24.37% return vs 19.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MOOD or VFLO?

VFLO is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for MOOD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MOOD or VFLO?

VFLO has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.36% for MOOD.

What is the main difference between MOOD and VFLO?

MOOD is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while VFLO is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Victory. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for MOOD and 0.39% for VFLO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VFLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.