PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MOOD vs. TDSB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MOOD vs. TDSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) and Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF (TDSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MOOD vs. TDSB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
MOOD
Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF
6.93%30.39%12.53%12.56%-2.90%
TDSB
Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF
2.64%12.95%3.56%4.71%-2.86%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOOD achieves a 6.93% return, which is significantly higher than TDSB's 2.64% return.


MOOD

1D
0.20%
1M
-5.74%
YTD
6.93%
6M
13.11%
1Y
32.14%
3Y*
18.57%
5Y*
10Y*

TDSB

1D
0.41%
1M
-2.70%
YTD
2.64%
6M
5.39%
1Y
12.45%
3Y*
8.35%
5Y*
2.34%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MOOD vs. TDSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOOD has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than TDSB's 0.69% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MOOD vs. TDSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOOD
MOOD Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
MOOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOOD Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
MOOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOOD Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

TDSB
TDSB Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
TDSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDSB Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
TDSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDSB Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOOD vs. TDSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) and Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF (TDSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MOODTDSBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.26

1.67

+0.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.70

2.21

+0.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.34

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.32

2.04

+1.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.81

8.19

+3.62

MOOD vs. TDSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOOD Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is higher than the TDSB Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOOD and TDSB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MOODTDSBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

1.67

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.24

0.28

+0.96

Correlation

The correlation between MOOD and TDSB is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

MOOD vs. TDSB - Dividend Comparison

MOOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than TDSB's 2.17% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
MOOD
Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF
0.38%0.40%1.33%1.34%1.43%0.00%0.00%
TDSB
Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF
2.17%1.93%3.50%2.77%1.81%1.75%0.46%

Drawdowns

MOOD vs. TDSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOOD drawdown since its inception was -14.34%, smaller than the maximum TDSB drawdown of -19.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOOD and TDSB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MOODTDSBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.34%

-19.56%

+5.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.71%

-6.02%

-3.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.10%

-2.70%

-4.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.27%

-9.36%

+7.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

1.50%

+1.23%

Volatility

MOOD vs. TDSB - Volatility Comparison

Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) has a higher volatility of 4.42% compared to Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF (TDSB) at 2.63%. This indicates that MOOD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MOODTDSBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.42%

2.63%

+1.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.00%

5.11%

+7.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.26%

7.49%

+6.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.17%

7.38%

+4.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.17%

7.58%

+4.59%