PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MOO vs. SCHB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MOO vs. SCHB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MOO (VanEck Agribusiness ETF) and SCHB (Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - MOO tracks the MVIS Global Agribusiness Index while SCHB tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MOO returned 7.00%/yr vs 15.04%/yr for SCHB. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MOO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHB.

Performance

MOO vs. SCHB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOO achieves a 10.10% return, which is significantly lower than SCHB's 11.28% return. Over the past 10 years, MOO has underperformed SCHB with an annualized return of 7.00%, while SCHB has yielded a comparatively higher 15.04% annualized return.

MOO

1D
0.48%
1M
-4.21%
YTD
10.10%
6M
11.54%
1Y
13.06%
3Y*
3.07%
5Y*
-0.70%
10Y*
7.00%

SCHB

1D
-0.72%
1M
5.01%
YTD
11.28%
6M
11.12%
1Y
28.12%
3Y*
22.11%
5Y*
12.76%
10Y*
15.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOO vs. SCHB - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MOO
VanEck Agribusiness ETF		10.10%15.61%-12.43%-8.57%-8.10%23.99%14.59%22.29%-6.03%21.75%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF		11.28%16.94%23.93%26.16%-19.46%25.84%20.76%30.79%-5.43%21.20%

Correlation

The correlation between MOO and SCHB is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2009

0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between MOO and SCHB has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

MOO vs. SCHB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
MOO
SCHB

Consumer Defensive

37.9%
4.6%

Basic Materials

26.2%
2.0%

Industrials

20.3%
9.4%

Healthcare

15.4%
8.9%

Communication Services

-

10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.1%

Energy

-

3.7%

Financial Services

-

12.2%

Real Estate

-

2.4%

Technology

-

34.4%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Consumer Defensive

MOO
37.9%
SCHB
4.6%

Basic Materials

MOO
26.2%
SCHB
2.0%

Industrials

MOO
20.3%
SCHB
9.4%

Healthcare

MOO
15.4%
SCHB
8.9%

Communication Services

MOO

-

SCHB
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

MOO

-

SCHB
10.1%

Energy

MOO

-

SCHB
3.7%

Financial Services

MOO

-

SCHB
12.2%

Real Estate

MOO

-

SCHB
2.4%

Technology

MOO

-

SCHB
34.4%

Utilities

MOO

-

SCHB
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck Agribusiness ETF

Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF

Often compared with MOO:
MOO vs. VEGIMOO vs. DBAMOO vs. KROPMOO vs. SPYMOO vs. VOOMOO vs. PHOMOO vs. FTAG
Often compared with SCHB:
SCHB vs. VTISCHB vs. SCHGSCHB vs. SCHXSCHB vs. VOOSCHB vs. SCHDSCHB vs. SWTSXSCHB vs. SPY

Return for Risk

MOO vs. SCHB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MOO
MOO Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
MOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOO Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
MOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOO Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
SCHB
SCHB Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SCHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHB Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHB Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOO vs. SCHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

MOOSCHBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.95
2.33

-1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.43
3.19

-1.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.42

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

3.17

-1.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.88

14.55

-10.67

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MOO vs. SCHB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOO Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the SCHB Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOO and SCHB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

MOOSCHBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

2.33

-1.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

0.74

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.82

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.83

-0.61

Drawdowns

MOO vs. SCHB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOO drawdown since its inception was -69.53%, which is greater than SCHB's maximum drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOO and SCHB.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MOOSCHBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.53%

-35.27%

-34.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.45%

-8.91%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.83%

-19.34%

-7.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.52%

-25.41%

-14.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.52%

-35.27%

-4.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.50%

-0.72%

-16.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.97%

-4.12%

-12.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

1.94%

+1.43%

Volatility

MOO vs. SCHB - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) has a higher volatility of 4.08% compared to Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) at 3.01%. This indicates that MOO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MOOSCHBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.08%

3.01%

+1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.57%

9.14%

+1.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.88%

12.12%

+1.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.12%

17.24%

-0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.19%

18.32%

-0.13%

MOO vs. SCHB - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHB's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

MOO vs. SCHB - Dividend Comparison

MOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, more than SCHB's 1.02% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MOO
VanEck Agribusiness ETF		2.24%2.47%3.41%2.93%2.15%1.17%1.10%1.26%1.69%1.44%2.14%2.89%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF		1.02%1.11%1.24%1.40%1.61%1.21%1.63%1.80%2.00%1.65%1.86%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

MOO and SCHB have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MOO has higher volatility (4.08%) compared to SCHB (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOO dropped -69.53% vs SCHB's -35.27%.

On 10-year performance, SCHB leads with 15.04% vs 7.00% for MOO. On fees, SCHB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHB has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHB has performed better with a 15.04% return vs 7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for MOO.

MOO has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 1.02% for SCHB.

MOO tracks MVIS Global Agribusiness Index, while SCHB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for MOO and 0.03% for SCHB.

SCHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MOO and SCHB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer