PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MOO vs. ITA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MOO vs. ITA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) and iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOO achieves a 7.97% return, which is significantly lower than ITA's 8.97% return. Over the past 10 years, MOO has underperformed ITA with an annualized return of 7.09%, while ITA has yielded a comparatively higher 15.34% annualized return.


MOO

1D
0.85%
1M
-4.12%
YTD
7.97%
6M
8.15%
1Y
8.56%
3Y*
1.51%
5Y*
-0.93%
10Y*
7.09%

ITA

1D
-0.95%
1M
4.16%
YTD
8.97%
6M
11.71%
1Y
30.42%
3Y*
27.30%
5Y*
16.86%
10Y*
15.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOO vs. ITA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MOO
VanEck Agribusiness ETF
7.97%15.61%-12.43%-8.57%-8.10%23.99%14.59%22.29%-6.03%21.75%
ITA
iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF
8.97%48.64%15.81%14.33%9.96%9.39%-13.57%30.51%-7.22%35.24%

Correlation

The correlation between MOO and ITA is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2007

0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between MOO and ITA has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

MOO vs. ITA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MOO
ITA

Consumer Defensive

36.8%

-

Basic Materials

25.5%

-

Industrials

20.9%
99.8%

Healthcare

16.8%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Defensive

MOO
36.8%
ITA

-

Basic Materials

MOO
25.5%
ITA

-

Industrials

MOO
20.9%
ITA
99.8%

Healthcare

MOO
16.8%
ITA

-

Communication Services

MOO

-

ITA

-

Consumer Cyclical

MOO

-

ITA

-

Energy

MOO

-

ITA

-

Financial Services

MOO

-

ITA

-

Real Estate

MOO

-

ITA

-

Technology

MOO

-

ITA
0.1%

Utilities

MOO

-

ITA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MOO vs. ITA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOO
MOO Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
MOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOO Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
MOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOO Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

ITA
ITA Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
ITA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITA Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
ITA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITA Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOO vs. ITA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) and iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MOOITADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.25

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.87

1.97

-1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.42

5.20

-2.78

MOO vs. ITA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOO Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the ITA Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOO and ITA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MOO vs. ITA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOO drawdown since its inception was -69.53%, which is greater than ITA's maximum drawdown of -59.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOO and ITA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MOOITADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.53%

-59.72%

-9.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.38%

-15.82%

+5.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.83%

-15.82%

-11.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.52%

-18.72%

-20.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.52%

-51.00%

+11.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.10%

-6.64%

-12.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.97%

-9.45%

-7.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.70%

5.97%

-2.27%

Volatility

MOO vs. ITA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) is 3.50%, while iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA) has a volatility of 9.07%. This indicates that MOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ITA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MOOITADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.50%

9.07%

-5.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.85%

18.47%

-7.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.16%

21.74%

-7.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.15%

20.21%

-3.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.19%

23.22%

-5.03%

MOO vs. ITA - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than ITA's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

MOO vs. ITA - Dividend Comparison

MOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, more than ITA's 0.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ITA
iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF
0.46%0.55%0.85%0.93%0.95%0.82%1.07%1.54%1.13%0.91%1.07%1.04%
MOO
VanEck Agribusiness ETF
2.29%2.47%3.41%2.93%2.15%1.17%1.10%1.26%1.69%1.44%2.14%2.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


MOO and ITA have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ITA has higher volatility (9.07%) compared to MOO (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOO dropped -69.53% vs ITA's -59.72%.

On 10-year performance, ITA leads with 15.34% vs 7.09% for MOO. On fees, ITA is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, MOO has been the lower-risk option at 3.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ITA has performed better with a 15.34% return vs 7.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITA is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for MOO.

MOO has the higher dividend yield at 2.29%, compared with 0.46% for ITA.

MOO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while ITA is Aerospace & Defense. MOO tracks MVIS Global Agribusiness Index, while ITA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Aerospace & Defense Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for MOO and 0.38% for ITA.

ITA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MOO and ITA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer