MON100.NS vs. FNGS
MON100.NS (Motilal Oswal NASDAQ 100 ETF) and FNGS (MicroSectors FANG+ ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - MON100.NS is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while FNGS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MON100.NS returned 40.12%/yr vs 30.15%/yr for FNGS. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.58% expense ratio.
Performance
MON100.NS vs. FNGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MON100.NS achieves a 40.66% return, which is significantly higher than FNGS's 4.28% return.
MON100.NS
- 1D
- -3.12%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- 40.66%
- 6M
- 39.19%
- 1Y
- 76.01%
- 3Y*
- 40.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNGS
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -7.56%
- YTD
- 4.28%
- 6M
- 2.54%
- 1Y
- 12.94%
- 3Y*
- 30.15%
- 5Y*
- 17.70%
- 10Y*
- —
MON100.NS vs. FNGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MON100.NS Motilal Oswal NASDAQ 100 ETF | 40.66% | 8.13% | 56.78% | 53.59% | -26.01% | 0.06% |
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN | 4.28% | 18.64% | 51.99% | 95.24% | -40.32% | -6.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between MON100.NS and FNGS is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2021 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MON100.NS vs. FNGS — Risk / Return Rank
MON100.NS
FNGS
MON100.NS vs. FNGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motilal Oswal NASDAQ 100 ETF (MON100.NS) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MON100.NS | FNGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 1.12 | +0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.03 | 0.57 | +5.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.76 | 1.58 | +13.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MON100.NS vs. FNGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MON100.NS drawdown since its inception was -28.31%, smaller than the maximum FNGS drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MON100.NS and FNGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MON100.NS | FNGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.31% | -48.98% | +20.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.01% | -22.93% | +9.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.02% | -26.77% | +0.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -48.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.88% | -11.75% | +6.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.24% | -10.84% | +1.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.25% | 8.21% | -2.96% |
Volatility
MON100.NS vs. FNGS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Motilal Oswal NASDAQ 100 ETF (MON100.NS) is 8.00%, while MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) has a volatility of 10.48%. This indicates that MON100.NS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MON100.NS | FNGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.00% | 10.48% | -2.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.50% | 18.00% | -0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.79% | 22.60% | -0.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.71% | 30.25% | -8.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.71% | 31.22% | -9.51% |
MON100.NS vs. FNGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MON100.NS and FNGS have an expense ratio of 0.58%.
Dividends
MON100.NS vs. FNGS - Dividend Comparison
Neither MON100.NS nor FNGS has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MON100.NS Motilal Oswal NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MON100.NS and FNGS have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.58% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MON100.NS and FNGS have the same expense ratio: 0.58% per year.
MON100.NS is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while FNGS is Large Cap Growth Equities. MON100.NS tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while FNGS tracks NYSE FANG+ Index. They also come from different issuers: Motilal Oswal and BMO.
Find the right allocation for MON100.NS and FNGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer