MON100.NS vs. FNGS
Compare and contrast key facts about Motilal Oswal NASDAQ 100 ETF (MON100.NS) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS).
MON100.NS and FNGS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MON100.NS is a passively managed fund by Motilal Oswal that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Mar 29, 2011. FNGS is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the NYSE FANG+ Index. It was launched on Nov 12, 2019. Both MON100.NS and FNGS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
MON100.NS vs. FNGS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MON100.NS vs. FNGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MON100.NS Motilal Oswal NASDAQ 100 ETF | 2.62% | 8.64% | 56.36% | 53.45% | -26.09% | 30.21% | 50.75% | 6.18% |
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN | -10.61% | 18.64% | 51.99% | 95.24% | -40.32% | 16.96% | 101.99% | 10.91% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MON100.NS achieves a 2.62% return, which is significantly higher than FNGS's -10.61% return.
MON100.NS
- 1D
- 2.79%
- 1M
- 6.99%
- YTD
- 2.62%
- 6M
- 7.51%
- 1Y
- 32.17%
- 3Y*
- 31.68%
- 5Y*
- 20.17%
- 10Y*
- 23.33%
FNGS
- 1D
- 2.05%
- 1M
- -3.29%
- YTD
- -10.61%
- 6M
- -12.74%
- 1Y
- 20.77%
- 3Y*
- 31.31%
- 5Y*
- 16.15%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MON100.NS vs. FNGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MON100.NS and FNGS have an expense ratio of 0.58%.
Return for Risk
MON100.NS vs. FNGS — Risk / Return Rank
MON100.NS
FNGS
MON100.NS vs. FNGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motilal Oswal NASDAQ 100 ETF (MON100.NS) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MON100.NS | FNGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.61 | 0.77 | +0.84 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.36 | 1.32 | +1.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.17 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.01 | 0.96 | +1.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.37 | 2.94 | +1.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MON100.NS | FNGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | 0.77 | +0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.02 | 0.54 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 0.91 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between MON100.NS and FNGS is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MON100.NS vs. FNGS - Dividend Comparison
Neither MON100.NS nor FNGS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
MON100.NS vs. FNGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MON100.NS drawdown since its inception was -36.27%, smaller than the maximum FNGS drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MON100.NS and FNGS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MON100.NS | FNGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.27% | -48.98% | +12.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.06% | -22.93% | +9.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.34% | -48.98% | +20.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.57% | -17.66% | +13.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.33% | -11.02% | +3.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.41% | 7.52% | -1.11% |
Volatility
MON100.NS vs. FNGS - Volatility Comparison
Motilal Oswal NASDAQ 100 ETF (MON100.NS) has a higher volatility of 9.18% compared to MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) at 8.61%. This indicates that MON100.NS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MON100.NS | FNGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.18% | 8.61% | +0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.26% | 15.82% | +0.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.56% | 27.04% | -6.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.24% | 29.98% | -9.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.07% | 31.34% | -8.27% |