MOMO vs. CINF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MOMO (Momo Inc.) and CINF (Cincinnati Financial Corporation) are both stocks. MOMO operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services), while CINF operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, MOMO returned -2.73%/yr vs 11.49%/yr for CINF. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MOMO vs. CINF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Momo Inc. (MOMO) and Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOMO achieves a -7.88% return, which is significantly lower than CINF's -2.68% return. Over the past 10 years, MOMO has underperformed CINF with an annualized return of -2.73%, while CINF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.49% annualized return.

MOMO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -7.54%
• YTD: -7.88%
• 6M: -13.06%
• 1Y: -1.73%
• 3Y*: -7.62%
• 5Y*: -9.03%
• 10Y*: -2.73%

CINF

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: -0.97%
• YTD: -2.68%
• 6M: -1.87%
• 1Y: 6.69%
• 3Y*: 19.23%
• 5Y*: 7.56%
• 10Y*: 11.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOMO vs. CINF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MOMO Momo Inc.	-7.88%	-10.17%	21.75%	-15.26%	12.98%	-32.96%	-56.80%	43.24%	-2.98%	33.19%
CINF Cincinnati Financial Corporation	-2.68%	16.27%	42.48%	4.00%	-7.89%	33.28%	-14.15%	38.87%	6.25%	2.34%

Correlation

The correlation between MOMO and CINF is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.09
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2014	0.15

The correlation between MOMO and CINF shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.15 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS MOMO : $4.44 CINF : $23.30
PE Ratio MOMO : 1.30 CINF : 6.78
PS Ratio MOMO : 0.09 CINF : 1.45
Total Revenue (TTM) MOMO : $10.22B CINF : $12.92B
Gross Profit (TTM) MOMO : $3.89B CINF : $5.39B
EBITDA (TTM) MOMO : $1.70B CINF : $3.27B

Return for Risk

MOMO vs. CINF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOMO

MOMO Risk / Return Rank: 37
MOMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
MOMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
MOMO Omega Ratio Rank: 33
MOMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
MOMO Martin Ratio Rank: 39

CINF

CINF Risk / Return Rank: 50
CINF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
CINF Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
CINF Omega Ratio Rank: 43
CINF Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
CINF Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOMO vs. CINF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Momo Inc. (MOMO) and Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MOMO	CINF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.05	0.35	-0.40
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.17	0.61	-0.44
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.07	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.05	0.64	-0.69
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.07	1.66	-1.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MOMO vs. CINF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOMO Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the CINF Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOMO and CINF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MOMO	CINF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05	0.35	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.15	0.30	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.05	0.40	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.06	0.42	-0.48

Drawdowns

MOMO vs. CINF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOMO drawdown since its inception was -90.31%, which is greater than CINF's maximum drawdown of -59.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOMO and CINF.

Drawdown Indicators

	MOMO	CINF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.31%	-59.64%	-30.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.50%	-10.46%	-27.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-50.91%	-20.03%	-30.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-70.18%	-35.77%	-34.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-90.31%	-58.12%	-32.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-82.36%	-7.94%	-74.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-54.26%	-12.20%	-42.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.57%	4.05%	+19.52%

Volatility

MOMO vs. CINF - Volatility Comparison

Momo Inc. (MOMO) has a higher volatility of 9.67% compared to Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) at 4.44%. This indicates that MOMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CINF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MOMO	CINF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.67%	4.44%	+5.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.12%	13.21%	+7.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.93%	19.42%	+13.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	61.72%	25.65%	+36.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	59.54%	28.79%	+30.75%

Dividends

MOMO vs. CINF - Dividend Comparison

MOMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, more than CINF's 2.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CINF Cincinnati Financial Corporation	2.25%	2.13%	2.25%	2.90%	2.70%	2.21%	2.75%	2.13%	2.74%	3.33%	2.53%	3.89%
MOMO Momo Inc.	4.86%	4.58%	7.00%	10.36%	7.13%	7.13%	5.44%	1.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

MOMO vs. CINF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Momo Inc. and Cincinnati Financial Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

MOMO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Momo Inc. reported a gross profit of 917.07M and revenue of 2.37B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.7%.

CINF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cincinnati Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

MOMO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Momo Inc. reported an operating income of 295.46M and revenue of 2.37B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.5%.

CINF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cincinnati Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 2.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

MOMO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Momo Inc. reported a net income of 289.29M and revenue of 2.37B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.

CINF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cincinnati Financial Corporation reported a net income of 274.00M and revenue of 2.86B, resulting in a net margin of 9.6%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MOMO and CINF in my portfolio?

MOMO and CINF have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MOMO or CINF?

MOMO has higher volatility (9.67%) compared to CINF (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOMO dropped -90.31% vs CINF's -59.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CINF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.35 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.