WWD vs. AAPL
WWD (Woodward, Inc.) and AAPL (Apple Inc) are both stocks. WWD operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while AAPL operates in Consumer Electronics (Technology). Over the past 10 years, WWD returned 20.95%/yr vs 29.23%/yr for AAPL. Their 0.27 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
WWD vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WWD achieves a 19.53% return, which is significantly higher than AAPL's 13.84% return. Over the past 10 years, WWD has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 20.95%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 29.23% annualized return.
WWD
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- -13.70%
- 6M
- 13.70%
- YTD
- 19.53%
- 1Y
- 39.68%
- 3Y*
- 40.62%
- 5Y*
- 25.07%
- 10Y*
- 20.95%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.97%
AAPL
- 1D
- -7.35%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 19.27%
- YTD
- 13.84%
- 1Y
- 53.24%
- 3Y*
- 16.99%
- 5Y*
- 16.79%
- 10Y*
- 29.23%
- ALL TIME*
- 19.30%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | $19.18B | $17.68B | $17.20B |
| $294.13M | $263.68M | $299.57M |
WWD vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WWD Woodward, Inc. | 19.53% | 82.58% | 23.01% | 41.97% | -11.09% | -9.43% | 3.18% | 60.42% | -2.23% | 11.63% |
AAPL Apple Inc | 13.84% | 9.05% | 30.71% | 49.01% | -26.40% | 34.65% | 82.31% | 88.96% | -5.39% | 48.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between WWD and AAPL is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 1996 | 0.27 |
The correlation between WWD and AAPL shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.32 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
WWD:
$21.49B
AAPL:
$4.54T
WWD:
$8.97
AAPL:
$8.69
WWD:
40.20
AAPL:
35.54
WWD:
1.56
AAPL:
4.68
WWD:
5.29
AAPL:
9.82
WWD:
8.94
AAPL:
42.38
WWD:
$4.19B
AAPL:
$466.82B
WWD:
$277.40M
AAPL:
$227.12B
WWD:
$766.46M
AAPL:
$168.49B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WWD vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank
WWD
AAPL
WWD vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Woodward, Inc. (WWD) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WWD | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.35 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | 3.60 | -1.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.53 | 8.56 | -2.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WWD vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WWD drawdown since its inception was -83.18%, roughly equal to the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WWD and AAPL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WWD | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.18% | -81.80% | -1.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.37% | -13.80% | -4.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.31% | -33.36% | +14.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.25% | -33.36% | -3.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.61% | -38.52% | -22.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.34% | -9.17% | -8.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.82% | -29.52% | +11.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.28% | 5.79% | +0.49% |
Volatility
WWD vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison
Woodward, Inc. (WWD) has a higher volatility of 12.81% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 11.52%. This indicates that WWD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WWD | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.81% | 11.52% | +1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.73% | 20.71% | +10.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.91% | 25.91% | +12.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.42% | 28.02% | +4.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.55% | 29.12% | +6.43% |
Dividends
WWD vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison
WWD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than AAPL's 0.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | 0.34% | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.49% | 0.61% | 1.04% | 1.79% | 1.45% | 1.93% | 1.93% |
WWD Woodward, Inc. | 0.33% | 0.37% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.79% | 0.59% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.77% | 0.65% | 0.64% | 0.81% |
Financials
WWD vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Woodward, Inc. and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WWD vs. AAPL - Profitability Comparison
WWD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Woodward, Inc. reported a gross profit of -608.07M and revenue of 1.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -54.8%.
AAPL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 54.77B and revenue of 109.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.1%.
WWD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Woodward, Inc. reported an operating income of -326.92M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in an operating margin of -29.5%.
AAPL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 35.70B and revenue of 109.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.6%.
WWD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Woodward, Inc. reported a net income of 146.68M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in a net margin of 13.2%.
AAPL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Apple Inc reported a net income of 29.79B and revenue of 109.42B, resulting in a net margin of 27.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WWD and AAPL have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WWD has higher volatility (12.81%) compared to AAPL (11.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WWD dropped -83.18% vs AAPL's -81.80%.
AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WWD and AAPL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer