MODL vs. WLTG

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

MODL (Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF) and WLTG (WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, MODL returned 20.33%/yr vs 24.05%/yr for WLTG. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MODL charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for WLTG.

Performance

MODL vs. WLTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF (MODL) and WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF (WLTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MODL achieves a 7.80% return, which is significantly lower than WLTG's 8.39% return.

MODL

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 4.08%
• YTD: 7.80%
• 6M: 8.04%
• 1Y: 24.87%
• 3Y*: 20.33%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WLTG

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 2.09%
• YTD: 8.39%
• 6M: 9.85%
• 1Y: 29.68%
• 3Y*: 24.05%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MODL vs. WLTG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
MODL Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF	7.80%	18.99%	24.73%	23.74%	7.13%
WLTG WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF	8.39%	24.55%	26.90%	17.00%	2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between MODL and WLTG is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2022	0.89

The correlation between MODL and WLTG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MODL vs. WLTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MODL

MODL Risk / Return Rank: 64
MODL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
MODL Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
MODL Omega Ratio Rank: 66
MODL Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
MODL Martin Ratio Rank: 65

WLTG

WLTG Risk / Return Rank: 67
WLTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
WLTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
WLTG Omega Ratio Rank: 65
WLTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
WLTG Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MODL vs. WLTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF (MODL) and WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF (WLTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MODL	WLTG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.24	2.24	0.00
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.16	3.08	+0.08
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.40	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.68	3.16	-0.47
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.07	14.25	-2.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MODL vs. WLTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MODL Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the WLTG Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MODL and WLTG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MODL	WLTG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.24	2.24	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.59	0.70	+0.89

Drawdowns

MODL vs. WLTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MODL drawdown since its inception was -17.60%, smaller than the maximum WLTG drawdown of -25.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MODL and WLTG.

Drawdown Indicators

	MODL	WLTG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.60%	-25.14%	+7.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.46%	-9.56%	+0.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.60%	-17.12%	-0.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.17%	0.00%	-0.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.04%	-9.08%	+7.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.10%	2.12%	-0.02%

Volatility

MODL vs. WLTG - Volatility Comparison

Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF (MODL) and WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF (WLTG) have volatilities of 2.63% and 2.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MODL	WLTG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.63%	2.75%	-0.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.37%	10.14%	-1.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.14%	13.29%	-2.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.59%	15.14%	-0.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.59%	15.14%	-0.55%

MODL vs. WLTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MODL has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than WLTG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

MODL vs. WLTG - Dividend Comparison

MODL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than WLTG's 4.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MODL Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF	0.67%	0.67%	0.83%	1.02%	0.39%	0.00%
WLTG WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF	4.09%	4.43%	0.55%	0.71%	0.44%	0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MODL and WLTG in my portfolio?

MODL and WLTG have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MODL or WLTG?

WLTG has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to MODL (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MODL dropped -17.60% vs WLTG's -25.14%.

Which ETF is better, MODL or WLTG?

On 3-year performance, WLTG leads with 24.05% vs 20.33% for MODL. On fees, MODL is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, MODL has been the lower-risk option at 2.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MODL or WLTG?

Over the 3-year period, WLTG has performed better with a 24.05% return vs 20.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MODL or WLTG?

MODL is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for WLTG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MODL or WLTG?

WLTG has the higher dividend yield at 4.09%, compared with 0.67% for MODL.

What is the main difference between MODL and WLTG?

They also come from different issuers: Victory and WealthTrust. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for MODL and 0.75% for WLTG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WLTG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.