PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MOAT vs. XME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MOAT vs. XME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) and SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOAT achieves a 2.49% return, which is significantly higher than XME's -5.54% return. Over the past 10 years, MOAT has underperformed XME with an annualized return of 13.39%, while XME has yielded a comparatively higher 15.15% annualized return.


MOAT

1D
-0.11%
1M
3.94%
6M
-0.75%
YTD
2.49%
1Y
11.94%
3Y*
10.06%
5Y*
8.54%
10Y*
13.39%
ALL TIME*
13.70%

XME

1D
-0.62%
1M
-16.42%
6M
-21.16%
YTD
-5.54%
1Y
30.48%
3Y*
24.42%
5Y*
19.38%
10Y*
15.15%
ALL TIME*
5.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOAT vs. XME - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
2.49%13.20%10.73%31.89%-13.66%24.12%14.84%34.79%-1.28%23.18%
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
-5.54%83.47%-4.54%21.51%13.13%34.92%15.95%14.69%-26.78%21.17%

Correlation

The correlation between MOAT and XME is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2012

0.58

The correlation between MOAT and XME shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MOAT vs. XME - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MOAT
XME

Technology

30.8%
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

18.2%
0.7%

Healthcare

18.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%

-

Industrials

9.5%
0.4%

Financial Services

9.2%

-

Communication Services

2.4%

-

Real Estate

0.7%

-

Basic Materials

-

74.8%

Energy

-

24.0%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

MOAT
30.8%
XME
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

MOAT
18.2%
XME
0.7%

Healthcare

MOAT
18.1%
XME

-

Consumer Cyclical

MOAT
11.1%
XME

-

Industrials

MOAT
9.5%
XME
0.4%

Financial Services

MOAT
9.2%
XME

-

Communication Services

MOAT
2.4%
XME

-

Real Estate

MOAT
0.7%
XME

-

Basic Materials

MOAT

-

XME
74.8%

Energy

MOAT

-

XME
24.0%

Utilities

MOAT

-

XME

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MOAT vs. XME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOAT
MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

XME
XME Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
XME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XME Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
XME Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
XME Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
XME Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOAT vs. XME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) and SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MOATXMEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.16

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.97

1.16

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.86

2.79

+0.07

MOAT vs. XME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOAT Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is comparable to the XME Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOAT and XME, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MOAT vs. XME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOAT drawdown since its inception was -33.31%, smaller than the maximum XME drawdown of -85.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOAT and XME.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MOATXMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.31%

-85.89%

+52.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.43%

-26.37%

+13.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.44%

-30.47%

+9.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.96%

-37.27%

+13.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.31%

-61.69%

+28.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.42%

-26.37%

+24.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.82%

-43.97%

+40.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.18%

10.94%

-6.76%

Volatility

MOAT vs. XME - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) is 3.60%, while SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) has a volatility of 8.26%. This indicates that MOAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MOATXMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

8.26%

-4.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.40%

28.01%

-17.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.95%

36.42%

-22.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.26%

32.67%

-14.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.61%

32.86%

-14.25%

MOAT vs. XME - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOAT has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than XME's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

MOAT vs. XME - Dividend Comparison

MOAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, more than XME's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
1.32%1.36%1.37%0.86%1.25%1.08%1.46%1.31%1.79%1.07%1.17%2.13%
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
0.38%0.38%0.65%1.00%1.64%0.70%0.99%2.43%2.23%1.15%1.02%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


MOAT and XME have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XME has higher volatility (8.26%) compared to MOAT (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOAT dropped -33.31% vs XME's -85.89%.

On 10-year performance, XME leads with 15.15% vs 13.39% for MOAT. On fees, XME is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, MOAT has been the lower-risk option at 3.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XME has performed better with a 15.15% return vs 13.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XME is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for MOAT.

MOAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.38% for XME.

MOAT is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while XME is Materials. MOAT tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index, while XME tracks S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for MOAT and 0.35% for XME.

MOAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MOAT and XME

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer