MOAT vs. VXF
MOAT (VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF) and VXF (Vanguard Extended Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MOAT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index, while VXF is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P Completion Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MOAT returned 13.47%/yr vs 12.32%/yr for VXF. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MOAT charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VXF.
Performance
MOAT vs. VXF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MOAT achieves a -0.66% return, which is significantly lower than VXF's 14.37% return. Over the past 10 years, MOAT has outperformed VXF with an annualized return of 13.47%, while VXF has yielded a comparatively lower 12.32% annualized return.
MOAT
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 3.44%
- YTD
- -0.66%
- 6M
- -1.22%
- 1Y
- 12.57%
- 3Y*
- 10.55%
- 5Y*
- 7.78%
- 10Y*
- 13.47%
VXF
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 4.74%
- YTD
- 14.37%
- 6M
- 12.25%
- 1Y
- 28.02%
- 3Y*
- 18.67%
- 5Y*
- 6.16%
- 10Y*
- 12.32%
MOAT vs. VXF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | -0.66% | 13.20% | 10.73% | 31.89% | -13.66% | 24.12% | 14.84% | 34.79% | -1.28% | 23.18% |
VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | 14.37% | 11.40% | 16.89% | 25.51% | -26.52% | 12.31% | 32.45% | 27.96% | -9.34% | 18.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between MOAT and VXF is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2012 | 0.84 |
The correlation between MOAT and VXF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
MOAT vs. VXF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MOAT
VXF
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Communication Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
MOAT
VXF
Consumer Defensive
MOAT
VXF
Healthcare
MOAT
VXF
Industrials
MOAT
VXF
Consumer Cyclical
MOAT
VXF
Financial Services
MOAT
VXF
Communication Services
MOAT
VXF
Real Estate
MOAT
VXF
Basic Materials
MOAT
-
VXF
Energy
MOAT
-
VXF
Utilities
MOAT
-
VXF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MOAT vs. VXF — Risk / Return Rank
MOAT
VXF
MOAT vs. VXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) and Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MOAT | VXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.27 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.02 | 2.76 | -1.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.11 | 9.71 | -6.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MOAT vs. VXF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOAT drawdown since its inception was -33.31%, smaller than the maximum VXF drawdown of -58.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOAT and VXF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOAT | VXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.31% | -58.03% | +24.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.43% | -10.21% | -2.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.44% | -26.92% | +5.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.96% | -36.39% | +12.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.31% | -41.72% | +8.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.45% | -0.61% | -3.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.83% | -9.54% | +5.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.06% | 2.90% | +1.16% |
Volatility
MOAT vs. VXF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) is 4.13%, while Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF) has a volatility of 6.53%. This indicates that MOAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MOAT | VXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.13% | 6.53% | -2.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.90% | 13.27% | -3.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.93% | 17.83% | -3.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.20% | 22.41% | -4.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.68% | 22.33% | -3.65% |
MOAT vs. VXF - Expense Ratio Comparison
MOAT has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than VXF's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
MOAT vs. VXF - Dividend Comparison
MOAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, more than VXF's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | 1.36% | 1.36% | 1.37% | 0.86% | 1.25% | 1.08% | 1.46% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.07% | 1.17% | 2.13% |
VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | 1.02% | 1.14% | 1.09% | 1.27% | 1.15% | 1.13% | 1.07% | 1.30% | 1.66% | 1.25% | 1.43% | 1.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MOAT and VXF have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VXF has higher volatility (6.53%) compared to MOAT (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOAT dropped -33.31% vs VXF's -58.03%.
On 10-year performance, MOAT leads with 13.47% vs 12.32% for VXF. On fees, VXF is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MOAT has been the lower-risk option at 4.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MOAT has performed better with a 13.47% return vs 12.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VXF is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for MOAT.
MOAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 1.02% for VXF.
MOAT is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VXF is Mid Cap Blend Equities. MOAT tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index, while VXF tracks S&P Completion Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for MOAT and 0.05% for VXF.
VXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MOAT and VXF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer