MOAT vs. NLR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MOAT (VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF) and NLR (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MOAT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index, while NLR is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MOAT returned 13.37%/yr vs 13.66%/yr for NLR. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MOAT charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for NLR.

Performance

MOAT vs. NLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOAT achieves a -0.94% return, which is significantly lower than NLR's 6.14% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MOAT having a 13.37% annualized return and NLR not far ahead at 13.66%.

MOAT

• 1D: -1.37%
• 1M: 3.30%
• YTD: -0.94%
• 6M: -0.69%
• 1Y: 14.97%
• 3Y*: 11.34%
• 5Y*: 8.01%
• 10Y*: 13.37%

NLR

• 1D: -4.59%
• 1M: -8.11%
• YTD: 6.14%
• 6M: 1.51%
• 1Y: 36.84%
• 3Y*: 35.11%
• 5Y*: 21.94%
• 10Y*: 13.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOAT vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF	-0.94%	13.20%	10.73%	31.89%	-13.66%	24.12%	14.84%	34.79%	-1.28%	23.18%
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF	6.14%	56.50%	14.26%	36.67%	2.29%	13.63%	3.49%	0.20%	4.94%	8.25%

Correlation

The correlation between MOAT and NLR is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.35
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2012	0.50

The correlation between MOAT and NLR shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MOAT vs. NLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MOAT	NLR
Technology	32.8%	1.5%
Consumer Defensive	17.5%	-
Healthcare	16.0%	-
Industrials	13.5%	15.1%
Consumer Cyclical	10.3%	-
Financial Services	6.7%	-
Communication Services	2.4%	-
Real Estate	0.8%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Energy	-	46.0%
Utilities	-	37.4%

Return for Risk

MOAT vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOAT

MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 27
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 27
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 27

NLR

NLR Risk / Return Rank: 25
NLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
NLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
NLR Omega Ratio Rank: 24
NLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
NLR Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOAT vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MOAT	NLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.09	0.88	+0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.64	1.43	+0.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.17	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.21	1.43	-0.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.77	2.93	+0.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MOAT vs. NLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOAT Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the NLR Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOAT and NLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MOAT	NLR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.09	0.88	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44	0.75	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72	0.57	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.77	0.18	+0.60

Drawdowns

MOAT vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOAT drawdown since its inception was -33.31%, smaller than the maximum NLR drawdown of -65.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOAT and NLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	MOAT	NLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.31%	-65.05%	+31.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.43%	-25.80%	+13.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.44%	-30.48%	+9.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.96%	-30.48%	+6.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.31%	-34.35%	+1.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.72%	-19.80%	+15.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.83%	-35.72%	+31.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.98%	12.61%	-8.63%

Volatility

MOAT vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) is 3.82%, while VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) has a volatility of 13.18%. This indicates that MOAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MOAT	NLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.82%	13.18%	-9.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.87%	32.83%	-22.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.86%	42.32%	-28.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.18%	29.24%	-11.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.68%	24.02%	-5.34%

MOAT vs. NLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOAT has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than NLR's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

MOAT vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison

MOAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than NLR's 2.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF	1.37%	1.36%	1.37%	0.86%	1.25%	1.08%	1.46%	1.31%	1.79%	1.07%	1.17%	2.13%
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF	2.40%	2.55%	0.76%	4.54%	2.02%	1.99%	2.23%	2.21%	3.91%	4.86%	3.62%	3.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MOAT and NLR in my portfolio?

MOAT and NLR have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MOAT or NLR?

NLR has higher volatility (13.18%) compared to MOAT (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOAT dropped -33.31% vs NLR's -65.05%.

Which ETF is better, MOAT or NLR?

On 10-year performance, NLR leads with 13.66% vs 13.37% for MOAT. On fees, MOAT is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, MOAT has been the lower-risk option at 3.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MOAT or NLR?

Over the 10-year period, NLR has performed better with a 13.66% return vs 13.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MOAT or NLR?

MOAT is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for NLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MOAT or NLR?

NLR has the higher dividend yield at 2.40%, compared with 1.37% for MOAT.

What is the main difference between MOAT and NLR?

MOAT is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while NLR is Alternative Energy Equities. MOAT tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index, while NLR tracks MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for MOAT and 0.56% for NLR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MOAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.