MOAT vs. FTIF
MOAT (VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF) and FTIF (First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - MOAT tracks the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index while FTIF tracks the Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MOAT returned 12.01%/yr vs 11.08%/yr for FTIF. Their 0.61 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MOAT charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTIF.
Performance
MOAT vs. FTIF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MOAT achieves a 5.78% return, which is significantly lower than FTIF's 23.66% return.
MOAT
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- 3.07%
- 6M
- 4.21%
- YTD
- 5.78%
- 1Y
- 15.84%
- 3Y*
- 12.01%
- 5Y*
- 9.07%
- 10Y*
- 13.61%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.91%
FTIF
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 4.18%
- 6M
- 14.24%
- YTD
- 23.66%
- 1Y
- 33.50%
- 3Y*
- 11.08%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.81%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $97.77K | $75.15K | $62.02K | |
| $67.13M | $66.89M | $81.17M |
MOAT vs. FTIF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | 5.78% | 13.20% | 10.73% | 25.41% |
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF | 23.66% | 7.79% | 0.50% | 12.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between MOAT and FTIF is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2023 | 0.61 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MOAT and FTIF has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
MOAT vs. FTIF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MOAT
FTIF
Technology
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
MOAT
FTIF
Consumer Defensive
MOAT
FTIF
-
Healthcare
MOAT
FTIF
-
Consumer Cyclical
MOAT
FTIF
Industrials
MOAT
FTIF
Financial Services
MOAT
FTIF
-
Communication Services
MOAT
FTIF
-
Real Estate
MOAT
FTIF
Basic Materials
MOAT
-
FTIF
Energy
MOAT
-
FTIF
Utilities
MOAT
-
FTIF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MOAT vs. FTIF — Risk / Return Rank
MOAT
FTIF
MOAT vs. FTIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MOAT | FTIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.39 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.28 | 5.31 | -4.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.82 | 15.40 | -11.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MOAT vs. FTIF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOAT drawdown since its inception was -33.31%, which is greater than FTIF's maximum drawdown of -27.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOAT and FTIF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOAT | FTIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.31% | -27.83% | -5.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.43% | -6.34% | -6.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.44% | -27.83% | +6.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.20% | +2.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.82% | -5.90% | +2.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.16% | 2.18% | +1.98% |
Volatility
MOAT vs. FTIF - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) has a higher volatility of 4.08% compared to First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF) at 2.78%. This indicates that MOAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MOAT | FTIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.08% | 2.78% | +1.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.55% | 10.50% | +0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.01% | 14.85% | -0.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.30% | 18.72% | -0.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.63% | 18.72% | -0.09% |
MOAT vs. FTIF - Expense Ratio Comparison
MOAT has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than FTIF's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
MOAT vs. FTIF - Dividend Comparison
MOAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, more than FTIF's 1.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF | 1.08% | 1.45% | 2.88% | 1.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | 1.28% | 1.36% | 1.37% | 0.86% | 1.25% | 1.08% | 1.46% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.07% | 1.17% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MOAT and FTIF have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MOAT has higher volatility (4.08%) compared to FTIF (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOAT dropped -33.31% vs FTIF's -27.83%.
On 3-year performance, MOAT leads with 12.01% vs 11.08% for FTIF. On fees, MOAT is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, FTIF has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MOAT has performed better with a 12.01% return vs 11.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MOAT is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTIF.
MOAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 1.08% for FTIF.
MOAT tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index, while FTIF tracks Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for MOAT and 0.60% for FTIF.
FTIF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MOAT and FTIF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer