MOAT vs. BUL

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

MOAT (VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF) and BUL (Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MOAT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index, while BUL is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Cash Cows Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MOAT returned 9.07%/yr vs 10.23%/yr for BUL. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MOAT charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for BUL.

Performance

MOAT vs. BUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) and Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOAT achieves a 5.78% return, which is significantly lower than BUL's 12.10% return.

MOAT

• 1D: 1.36%
• 1M: 3.07%
• 6M: 4.21%
• YTD: 5.78%
• 1Y: 15.84%
• 3Y*: 12.01%
• 5Y*: 9.07%
• 10Y*: 13.61%
• ALL TIME*: 13.91%

BUL

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: 2.69%
• 6M: 8.67%
• YTD: 12.10%
• 1Y: 22.79%
• 3Y*: 20.03%
• 5Y*: 10.23%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BUL Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF	$436.05K	$379.45K	$479.01K
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF	$67.13M	$66.89M	$81.17M

MOAT vs. BUL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF	5.78%	13.20%	10.73%	31.89%	-13.66%	24.12%	14.84%	14.85%
BUL Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF	12.10%	19.18%	27.39%	3.68%	-16.18%	32.48%	27.26%	4.81%

Correlation

The correlation between MOAT and BUL is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.75
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2019	0.79

The correlation between MOAT and BUL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

MOAT vs. BUL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MOAT	BUL
Technology	30.8%	21.9%
Consumer Defensive	18.2%	2.6%
Healthcare	18.1%	27.8%
Consumer Cyclical	11.1%	28.2%
Industrials	9.5%	3.2%
Financial Services	9.2%	-
Communication Services	2.4%	1.5%
Real Estate	0.7%	-
Basic Materials	-	9.1%
Energy	-	5.5%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

MOAT vs. BUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MOAT

MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 41
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 40
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 37

BUL

BUL Risk / Return Rank: 61
BUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
BUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
BUL Omega Ratio Rank: 51
BUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
BUL Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MOAT vs. BUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) and Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MOAT	BUL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.14	1.35	-0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.70	2.05	-0.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.24	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.28	2.56	-1.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.82	9.02	-5.21

MOAT vs. BUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOAT Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is comparable to the BUL Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOAT and BUL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MOAT vs. BUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOAT drawdown since its inception was -33.31%, smaller than the maximum BUL drawdown of -37.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOAT and BUL.

Drawdown Indicators

	MOAT	BUL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.31%	-37.08%	+3.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.43%	-8.93%	-3.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.44%	-23.55%	+2.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.96%	-27.85%	+3.89%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.31%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.82%	-7.52%	+3.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.16%	2.53%	+1.63%

Volatility

MOAT vs. BUL - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) and Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL) have volatilities of 4.08% and 4.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MOAT	BUL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.08%	4.17%	-0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.55%	12.83%	-2.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.01%	16.93%	-2.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.30%	21.91%	-3.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.63%	24.11%	-5.48%

MOAT vs. BUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOAT has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than BUL's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

MOAT vs. BUL - Dividend Comparison

MOAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, more than BUL's 0.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BUL Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF	0.21%	0.28%	0.30%	2.11%	0.67%	0.08%	0.69%	0.81%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF	1.28%	1.36%	1.37%	0.86%	1.25%	1.08%	1.46%	1.31%	1.79%	1.07%	1.17%	2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MOAT and BUL in my portfolio?

MOAT and BUL have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MOAT or BUL?

BUL has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to MOAT (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOAT dropped -33.31% vs BUL's -37.08%.

Which ETF is better, MOAT or BUL?

On 5-year performance, BUL leads with 10.23% vs 9.07% for MOAT. On fees, MOAT is cheaper at 0.47% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MOAT or BUL?

Over the 5-year period, BUL has performed better with a 10.23% return vs 9.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MOAT or BUL?

MOAT is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for BUL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MOAT or BUL?

MOAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.21% for BUL.

What is the main difference between MOAT and BUL?

MOAT is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUL is Mid Cap Blend Equities. MOAT tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index, while BUL tracks Pacer US Cash Cows Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for MOAT and 0.60% for BUL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.