PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MOAT.L vs. RBOD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MOAT.L vs. RBOD.L

Last updated Jun 7, 2026

MOAT.L (VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF) and RBOD.L (iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MOAT.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, while RBOD.L is a Robotics fund tracking the iSTOXX® FactSet Automation & Robotics. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MOAT.L returned 3.00%/yr vs 9.90%/yr for RBOD.L. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MOAT.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RBOD.L.

Performance

MOAT.L vs. RBOD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (MOAT.L) and iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBOD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOAT.L achieves a -3.50% return, which is significantly lower than RBOD.L's 24.17% return.

MOAT.L

1D
-0.86%
1M
1.39%
YTD
-3.50%
6M
-3.97%
1Y
6.98%
3Y*
7.81%
5Y*
3.00%
10Y*
10.50%

RBOD.L

1D
-3.84%
1M
0.30%
YTD
24.17%
6M
22.05%
1Y
39.94%
3Y*
20.02%
5Y*
9.90%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOAT.L vs. RBOD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MOAT.L
VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF		-3.50%7.34%11.12%18.37%-18.70%25.53%13.62%33.78%-1.64%5.91%
RBOD.L
iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF		24.17%17.05%5.93%39.67%-34.54%20.90%39.66%37.09%-18.70%6.18%

Correlation

The correlation between MOAT.L and RBOD.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2017

0.77

The correlation between MOAT.L and RBOD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MOAT.L vs. RBOD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
MOAT.L
RBOD.L

Technology

24.3%
71.4%

Healthcare

23.2%
1.5%

Consumer Defensive

18.1%

-

Industrials

8.8%
26.2%

Consumer Cyclical

7.4%
0.1%

Financial Services

7.4%

-

Communication Services

6.2%

-

Basic Materials

4.2%
0.1%

Real Estate

0.5%

-

Energy

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

MOAT.L
24.3%
RBOD.L
71.4%

Healthcare

MOAT.L
23.2%
RBOD.L
1.5%

Consumer Defensive

MOAT.L
18.1%
RBOD.L

-

Industrials

MOAT.L
8.8%
RBOD.L
26.2%

Consumer Cyclical

MOAT.L
7.4%
RBOD.L
0.1%

Financial Services

MOAT.L
7.4%
RBOD.L

-

Communication Services

MOAT.L
6.2%
RBOD.L

-

Basic Materials

MOAT.L
4.2%
RBOD.L
0.1%

Real Estate

MOAT.L
0.5%
RBOD.L

-

Energy

MOAT.L

-

RBOD.L

-

Utilities

MOAT.L

-

RBOD.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF

iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF

Often compared with MOAT.L:
MOAT.L vs. QUALMOAT.L vs. VOOMOAT.L vs. MOATMOAT.L vs. MANHMOAT.L vs. GOGB.LMOAT.L vs. AMEM.DEMOAT.L vs. QQQM
Often compared with RBOD.L:
RBOD.L vs. RBTX.LRBOD.L vs. XDWT.LRBOD.L vs. FNGSRBOD.L vs. IRBORBOD.L vs. QQQRBOD.L vs. ROBG.LRBOD.L vs. IUIT.L

Return for Risk

MOAT.L vs. RBOD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MOAT.L
MOAT.L Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
MOAT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOAT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOAT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
MOAT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOAT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
RBOD.L
RBOD.L Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
RBOD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBOD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBOD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
RBOD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBOD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOAT.L vs. RBOD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (MOAT.L) and iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBOD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

MOAT.LRBOD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.53
1.71

-1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.90
2.48

-1.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.30

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.62

2.57

-1.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.65

8.85

-7.20

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MOAT.L vs. RBOD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOAT.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is lower than the RBOD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOAT.L and RBOD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

MOAT.LRBOD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

1.71

-1.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.42

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.54

+0.12

Drawdowns

MOAT.L vs. RBOD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOAT.L drawdown since its inception was -32.78%, smaller than the maximum RBOD.L drawdown of -44.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOAT.L and RBOD.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MOAT.LRBOD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.78%

-44.47%

+11.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.86%

-15.38%

+3.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.84%

-25.00%

+3.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.06%

-44.47%

+17.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.78%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.84%

-4.05%

-1.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.56%

-12.05%

+6.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.44%

4.49%

-0.05%

Volatility

MOAT.L vs. RBOD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (MOAT.L) is 3.60%, while iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBOD.L) has a volatility of 8.81%. This indicates that MOAT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RBOD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MOAT.LRBOD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

8.81%

-5.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.65%

19.00%

-9.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.79%

23.16%

-9.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.32%

23.79%

-7.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.91%

23.52%

-6.61%

MOAT.L vs. RBOD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOAT.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than RBOD.L's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

MOAT.L vs. RBOD.L - Dividend Comparison

MOAT.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RBOD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
MOAT.L
VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RBOD.L
iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF		0.28%0.34%0.36%0.45%0.56%0.32%0.34%0.79%1.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

MOAT.L and RBOD.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RBOD.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RBOD.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for MOAT.L.

MOAT.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while RBOD.L is Robotics. MOAT.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while RBOD.L tracks iSTOXX® FactSet Automation & Robotics. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for MOAT.L and 0.40% for RBOD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MOAT.L and RBOD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer