MO vs. FRT
MO (Altria Group, Inc.) and FRT (Federal Realty Investment Trust) are both stocks. MO operates in Tobacco (Consumer Defensive), while FRT operates in REIT - Retail (Real Estate). Over the past 10 years, MO returned 7.79%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for FRT. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MO vs. FRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MO achieves a 25.71% return, which is significantly higher than FRT's 23.82% return. Over the past 10 years, MO has outperformed FRT with an annualized return of 7.79%, while FRT has yielded a comparatively lower 1.31% annualized return.
MO
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- 4.65%
- YTD
- 25.71%
- 6M
- 27.02%
- 1Y
- 28.81%
- 3Y*
- 25.85%
- 5Y*
- 16.08%
- 10Y*
- 7.79%
FRT
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 5.55%
- YTD
- 23.82%
- 6M
- 30.67%
- 1Y
- 32.44%
- 3Y*
- 13.10%
- 5Y*
- 4.22%
- 10Y*
- 1.31%
MO vs. FRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MO Altria Group, Inc. | 25.71% | 18.17% | 40.76% | -3.70% | 4.37% | 24.18% | -10.21% | 7.87% | -27.14% | 9.45% |
FRT Federal Realty Investment Trust | 23.82% | -5.91% | 12.07% | 6.55% | -22.66% | 65.97% | -30.66% | 12.51% | -8.10% | -3.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between MO and FRT is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 1973 | 0.18 |
The correlation between MO and FRT shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (1 year) to 0.33 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MO:
$119.27B
FRT:
$10.58B
MO:
$4.79
FRT:
$5.87
MO:
14.87
FRT:
20.81
MO:
0.32
FRT:
1.26
MO:
5.49
FRT:
8.04
MO:
$21.82B
FRT:
$1.31B
MO:
$14.80B
FRT:
$703.03M
MO:
$11.70B
FRT:
$1.09B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MO vs. FRT — Risk / Return Rank
MO
FRT
MO vs. FRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Altria Group, Inc. (MO) and Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MO | FRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.33 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 4.68 | -2.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.45 | 11.42 | -6.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MO | FRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29 | 1.91 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.18 | +0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | 0.04 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.41 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
MO vs. FRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MO drawdown since its inception was -65.43%, which is greater than FRT's maximum drawdown of -57.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MO and FRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MO | FRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.43% | -57.42% | -8.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.40% | -6.96% | -9.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.40% | -27.38% | +10.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.83% | -34.99% | +9.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.69% | -56.47% | +2.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.37% | -0.38% | -3.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.93% | -11.78% | -0.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.49% | 2.85% | +3.64% |
Volatility
MO vs. FRT - Volatility Comparison
Altria Group, Inc. (MO) has a higher volatility of 6.69% compared to Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) at 4.11%. This indicates that MO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MO | FRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.69% | 4.11% | +2.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.32% | 11.81% | +5.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.53% | 17.08% | +5.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.64% | 23.34% | -2.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.96% | 29.44% | -6.48% |
Dividends
MO vs. FRT - Dividend Comparison
MO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.89%, more than FRT's 3.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRT Federal Realty Investment Trust | 3.68% | 4.39% | 2.93% | 4.21% | 4.26% | 3.12% | 4.96% | 3.22% | 3.42% | 2.98% | 2.70% | 2.48% |
MO Altria Group, Inc. | 5.89% | 7.21% | 7.65% | 9.52% | 8.05% | 7.43% | 8.29% | 6.57% | 6.07% | 3.56% | 3.48% | 3.73% |
Financials
MO vs. FRT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Altria Group, Inc. and Federal Realty Investment Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MO vs. FRT - Profitability Comparison
MO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Altria Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.51B and revenue of 5.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.6%.
FRT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Federal Realty Investment Trust reported a gross profit of 241.87M and revenue of 341.08M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.9%.
MO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Altria Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.96B and revenue of 5.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 54.5%.
FRT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Federal Realty Investment Trust reported an operating income of 116.27M and revenue of 341.08M, resulting in an operating margin of 34.1%.
MO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Altria Group, Inc. reported a net income of 2.18B and revenue of 5.43B, resulting in a net margin of 40.2%.
FRT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Federal Realty Investment Trust reported a net income of 159.10M and revenue of 341.08M, resulting in a net margin of 46.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MO and FRT have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MO has higher volatility (6.69%) compared to FRT (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MO dropped -65.43% vs FRT's -57.42%.
FRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MO and FRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer