MNZL vs. USFR
MNZL (Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF) and USFR (WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - MNZL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell IdealRatings Manzil Halal USA Broad Market Index, while USFR is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.25, they often move in opposite directions. MNZL charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for USFR.
Performance
MNZL vs. USFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNZL achieves a 18.55% return, which is significantly higher than USFR's 2.01% return.
MNZL
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 2.37%
- 6M
- 16.46%
- YTD
- 18.55%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USFR
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 1.90%
- YTD
- 2.01%
- 1Y
- 3.93%
- 3Y*
- 4.71%
- 5Y*
- 3.75%
- 10Y*
- 2.49%
MNZL vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MNZL Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF | 18.55% | 3.37% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 2.01% | 0.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between MNZL and USFR is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | -0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MNZL vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank
MNZL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
USFR
MNZL vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF (MNZL) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MNZL | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 14.08 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 200.62 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 801.27 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MNZL vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNZL drawdown since its inception was -9.66%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNZL and USFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNZL | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.66% | -1.36% | -8.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.17% | 0.00% | -1.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.83% | -0.15% | -1.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility
MNZL vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MNZL | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.07% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.19% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.00% | 0.27% | +16.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.00% | 0.39% | +16.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.00% | 0.77% | +16.23% |
MNZL vs. USFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNZL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than USFR's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
MNZL vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison
MNZL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than USFR's 3.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNZL Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 3.84% | 4.15% | 5.17% | 5.12% | 1.78% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 2.08% | 1.67% | 1.03% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MNZL and USFR have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, USFR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
USFR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MNZL.
USFR has the higher dividend yield at 3.84%, compared with 0.03% for MNZL.
MNZL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while USFR is Government Bonds. MNZL tracks Russell IdealRatings Manzil Halal USA Broad Market Index, while USFR tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Manzil and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for MNZL and 0.15% for USFR.
Find the right allocation for MNZL and USFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer