MNZL vs. QMAR

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF (MNZL) and FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR).

MNZL and QMAR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MNZL is a passively managed fund by Manzil that tracks the performance of the Russell IdealRatings Manzil Halal USA Broad Market Index. It was launched on Nov 18, 2025. QMAR is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on Mar 19, 2021.

Performance

MNZL vs. QMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF (MNZL) and FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MNZL vs. QMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MNZL Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF	-1.26%	2.90%
QMAR FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March	2.45%	2.49%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNZL achieves a -1.26% return, which is significantly lower than QMAR's 2.45% return.

MNZL

• 1D: 1.12%
• 1M: -4.93%
• YTD: -1.26%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QMAR

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: 1.34%
• YTD: 2.45%
• 6M: 4.74%
• 1Y: 19.05%
• 3Y*: 15.09%
• 5Y*: 10.57%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNZL vs. QMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNZL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than QMAR's 0.90% expense ratio.

QMAR

FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March

MNZL

Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF

Return for Risk

MNZL vs. QMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QMAR

QMAR Risk / Return Rank: 84
QMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
QMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
QMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 95
QMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
QMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNZL vs. QMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF (MNZL) and FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MNZL	QMAR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.44	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.76	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	0.77	-0.48

Correlation

The correlation between MNZL and QMAR is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

MNZL vs. QMAR - Dividend Comparison

MNZL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, while QMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025
MNZL Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF	0.04%	0.04%
QMAR FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

MNZL vs. QMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNZL drawdown since its inception was -9.66%, smaller than the maximum QMAR drawdown of -19.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNZL and QMAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	MNZL	QMAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.66%	-19.83%	+10.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.23%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.83%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.99%	-0.32%	-5.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.05%	-3.39%	+1.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.33%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MNZL	QMAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.53%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	4.65%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.61%	13.26%	+2.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.61%	14.04%	+1.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.61%	14.02%	+1.59%