MNZL vs. NRSH
MNZL (Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF) and NRSH (Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - MNZL tracks the Russell IdealRatings Manzil Halal USA Broad Market Index while NRSH tracks the Aztlan North America Nearshoring Price Return Index - Benchmark Price Return. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MNZL charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NRSH.
Performance
MNZL vs. NRSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNZL achieves a 18.55% return, which is significantly lower than NRSH's 42.93% return.
MNZL
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 2.37%
- 6M
- 16.46%
- YTD
- 18.55%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NRSH
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- -1.56%
- 6M
- 35.29%
- YTD
- 42.93%
- 1Y
- 49.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MNZL vs. NRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MNZL Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF | 18.55% | 3.37% |
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF | 42.93% | 2.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between MNZL and NRSH is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MNZL vs. NRSH — Risk / Return Rank
MNZL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NRSH
MNZL vs. NRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF (MNZL) and Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MNZL | NRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.44 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.34 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MNZL vs. NRSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNZL drawdown since its inception was -9.66%, smaller than the maximum NRSH drawdown of -24.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNZL and NRSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNZL | NRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.66% | -24.01% | +14.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.17% | -3.99% | +2.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.83% | -5.52% | +3.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.68% | — |
Volatility
MNZL vs. NRSH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MNZL | NRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 22.45% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.00% | 26.65% | -9.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.00% | 22.27% | -5.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.00% | 22.27% | -5.27% |
MNZL vs. NRSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNZL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than NRSH's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
MNZL vs. NRSH - Dividend Comparison
MNZL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than NRSH's 0.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MNZL Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.90% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MNZL and NRSH have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MNZL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MNZL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for NRSH.
NRSH has the higher dividend yield at 0.29%, compared with 0.03% for MNZL.
MNZL tracks Russell IdealRatings Manzil Halal USA Broad Market Index, while NRSH tracks Aztlan North America Nearshoring Price Return Index - Benchmark Price Return. They also come from different issuers: Manzil and Aztlan. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for MNZL and 0.75% for NRSH.
Find the right allocation for MNZL and NRSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer