MNZL vs. MMKT
MNZL (Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF) and MMKT (Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MNZL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell IdealRatings Manzil Halal USA Broad Market Index, while MMKT is a Money Market fund actively managed by Texas Capital. MNZL is passively managed, while MMKT is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.17, they often move in opposite directions. MNZL charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for MMKT.
Performance
MNZL vs. MMKT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNZL achieves a 18.40% return, which is significantly higher than MMKT's 1.62% return.
MNZL
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 3.76%
- YTD
- 18.40%
- 6M
- 17.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MMKT
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 1.62%
- 6M
- 1.73%
- 1Y
- 3.79%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MNZL vs. MMKT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MNZL Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF | 18.40% | 3.37% |
MMKT Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF | 1.62% | 0.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between MNZL and MMKT is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | -0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MNZL vs. MMKT — Risk / Return Rank
MNZL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MMKT
MNZL vs. MMKT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF (MNZL) and Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MNZL | MMKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 15.54 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 152.72 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 913.70 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MNZL vs. MMKT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNZL drawdown since its inception was -9.66%, which is greater than MMKT's maximum drawdown of -0.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNZL and MMKT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNZL | MMKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.66% | -0.04% | -9.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.87% | 0.00% | -0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.83% | -0.00% | -1.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility
MNZL vs. MMKT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MNZL | MMKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.05% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.13% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.76% | 0.23% | +16.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.76% | 0.23% | +16.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.76% | 0.23% | +16.53% |
MNZL vs. MMKT - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNZL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than MMKT's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
MNZL vs. MMKT - Dividend Comparison
MNZL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than MMKT's 3.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MMKT Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF | 3.71% | 3.98% | 1.07% |
MNZL Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MNZL and MMKT have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MMKT is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MMKT is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MNZL.
MMKT has the higher dividend yield at 3.71%, compared with 0.03% for MNZL.
MNZL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MMKT is Money Market. They also come from different issuers: Manzil and Texas Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for MNZL and 0.20% for MMKT.
Find the right allocation for MNZL and MMKT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer