MNZL vs. DBC
MNZL (Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF) and DBC (Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - MNZL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell IdealRatings Manzil Halal USA Broad Market Index, while DBC is a Commodities fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.26, they often move in opposite directions. MNZL charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DBC.
Performance
MNZL vs. DBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNZL achieves a 18.20% return, which is significantly lower than DBC's 33.63% return.
MNZL
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 8.16%
- YTD
- 18.20%
- 6M
- 16.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBC
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- -4.23%
- YTD
- 33.63%
- 6M
- 33.19%
- 1Y
- 44.46%
- 3Y*
- 14.67%
- 5Y*
- 12.47%
- 10Y*
- 8.83%
MNZL vs. DBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MNZL Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF | 18.20% | 2.90% |
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 33.63% | 0.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between MNZL and DBC is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | -0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MNZL vs. DBC — Risk / Return Rank
MNZL
DBC
MNZL vs. DBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF (MNZL) and Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MNZL | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.84 | 0.11 | +2.73 |
Drawdowns
MNZL vs. DBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNZL drawdown since its inception was -9.66%, smaller than the maximum DBC drawdown of -76.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNZL and DBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNZL | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.66% | -76.36% | +66.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.04% | -22.70% | +21.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.74% | -46.22% | +44.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.33% | — |
Volatility
MNZL vs. DBC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MNZL | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.56% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.82% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.73% | 18.73% | -3.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.73% | 19.18% | -3.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.73% | 17.81% | -2.08% |
MNZL vs. DBC - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNZL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than DBC's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
MNZL vs. DBC - Dividend Comparison
MNZL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than DBC's 2.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 2.49% | 3.33% | 5.22% | 4.94% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.59% | 1.30% |
MNZL Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MNZL and DBC have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MNZL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MNZL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBC.
DBC has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 0.03% for MNZL.
MNZL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DBC is Commodities. MNZL tracks Russell IdealRatings Manzil Halal USA Broad Market Index, while DBC tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: Manzil and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for MNZL and 0.85% for DBC.
Find the right allocation for MNZL and DBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer