MNVT vs. GINX

Last updated Jul 25, 2026

MNVT (Moonvest ETF) and GINX (SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MNVT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for GINX.

Performance

MNVT vs. GINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Moonvest ETF (MNVT) and SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF (GINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MNVT

• 1D: -2.85%
• 1M: -6.54%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

GINX

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: 3.12%
• 6M: 10.48%
• YTD: 15.32%
• 1Y: 27.41%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GINX SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF	$229.24K	$276.43K	$252.19K
MNVT Moonvest ETF	$653.57K	$816.73K	$1.17M

MNVT vs. GINX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
MNVT Moonvest ETF	6.40%
GINX SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF	9.43%

Correlation

The correlation between MNVT and GINX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2026	0.40

Return for Risk

MNVT vs. GINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNVT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GINX

GINX Risk / Return Rank: 88
GINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
GINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
GINX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
GINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
GINX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNVT vs. GINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Moonvest ETF (MNVT) and SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF (GINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MNVT	GINX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.30	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.27	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.40	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.10	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	11.87	—

Drawdowns

MNVT vs. GINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNVT drawdown since its inception was -23.74%, which is greater than GINX's maximum drawdown of -12.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNVT and GINX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MNVT	GINX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.74%	-12.53%	-11.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.74%	0.00%	-23.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.51%	-1.74%	-6.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.32%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MNVT	GINX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.94%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.69%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.29%	12.01%	+33.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.29%	13.72%	+31.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	45.29%	13.72%	+31.57%

MNVT vs. GINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNVT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than GINX's 0.98% expense ratio.

Dividends

MNVT vs. GINX - Dividend Comparison

MNVT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GINX SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF	2.06%	2.81%	2.97%
MNVT Moonvest ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MNVT and GINX in my portfolio?

MNVT and GINX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MNVT or GINX?

On fees, MNVT is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MNVT or GINX?

MNVT is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for GINX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MNVT or GINX?

GINX has the higher dividend yield at 2.06%, compared with 0.00% for MNVT.

What is the main difference between MNVT and GINX?

They also come from different issuers: Moonvest and Summit Global Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for MNVT and 0.98% for GINX.