MNVT vs. DRIV
MNVT (Moonvest ETF) and DRIV (Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF) are both Global Equities funds. MNVT is actively managed, while DRIV is passively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MNVT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for DRIV.
Performance
MNVT vs. DRIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MNVT
- 1D
- -8.13%
- 1M
- 7.60%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DRIV
- 1D
- -7.85%
- 1M
- -0.77%
- YTD
- 30.55%
- 6M
- 28.46%
- 1Y
- 74.29%
- 3Y*
- 17.66%
- 5Y*
- 7.62%
- 10Y*
- —
MNVT vs. DRIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MNVT Moonvest ETF | 23.95% |
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF | 27.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between MNVT and DRIV is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026 | 0.61 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MNVT vs. DRIV — Risk / Return Rank
MNVT
DRIV
MNVT vs. DRIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Moonvest ETF (MNVT) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MNVT | DRIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.46 | 0.50 | +2.97 |
Drawdowns
MNVT vs. DRIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNVT drawdown since its inception was -12.56%, smaller than the maximum DRIV drawdown of -41.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNVT and DRIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNVT | DRIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.56% | -41.93% | +29.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -34.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -41.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.18% | -9.19% | -2.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.52% | -15.12% | +11.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.89% | — |
Volatility
MNVT vs. DRIV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MNVT | DRIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.23% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 21.04% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.76% | 26.40% | +22.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.76% | 27.28% | +21.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.76% | 27.53% | +21.23% |
MNVT vs. DRIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNVT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DRIV's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
MNVT vs. DRIV - Dividend Comparison
MNVT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DRIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF | 0.82% | 1.07% | 2.07% | 1.62% | 1.24% | 0.32% | 0.29% | 1.23% | 2.79% |
MNVT Moonvest ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MNVT and DRIV have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DRIV is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DRIV is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for MNVT.
DRIV has the higher dividend yield at 0.82%, compared with 0.00% for MNVT.
They also come from different issuers: Moonvest and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for MNVT and 0.68% for DRIV.
Find the right allocation for MNVT and DRIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer