PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MNRS vs. ETCO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MNRS vs. ETCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF (MNRS) and Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF (ETCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNRS achieves a 15.24% return, which is significantly higher than ETCO's -34.69% return.


MNRS

1D
-2.54%
1M
-6.16%
6M
0.46%
YTD
15.24%
1Y
39.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
20.02%

ETCO

1D
-2.50%
1M
5.77%
6M
-27.08%
YTD
-34.69%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$41.84K$37.58K$56.92K
$301.29K$286.50K$542.86K

MNRS vs. ETCO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MNRS
Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF
15.24%1.28%
ETCO
Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF
-34.69%-26.08%

Correlation

The correlation between MNRS and ETCO is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2025

0.58

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MNRS vs. ETCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MNRS
MNRS Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
MNRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNRS Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
MNRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNRS Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

ETCO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MNRS vs. ETCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF (MNRS) and Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF (ETCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MNRSETCODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.96

MNRS vs. ETCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MNRS vs. ETCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNRS drawdown since its inception was -56.70%, roughly equal to the maximum ETCO drawdown of -59.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNRS and ETCO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MNRSETCODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.70%

-59.43%

+2.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.48%

-55.22%

+18.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.92%

-38.17%

+14.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.84%

Volatility

MNRS vs. ETCO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MNRSETCODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

75.89%

50.60%

+25.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.74%

50.60%

+22.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.74%

50.60%

+22.14%

MNRS vs. ETCO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNRS has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than ETCO's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

MNRS vs. ETCO - Dividend Comparison

MNRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than ETCO's 153.50% yield.


PositionTTM2025
ETCO
Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF
153.50%42.29%
MNRS
Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF
0.47%0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


MNRS and ETCO have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MNRS is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MNRS is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for ETCO.

ETCO has the higher dividend yield at 153.50%, compared with 0.47% for MNRS.

MNRS is categorized as Blockchain, while ETCO is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MNRS and 0.66% for ETCO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MNRS and ETCO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer