MNRS vs. CIFU

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MNRS (Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF) and CIFU (T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MNRS is a Blockchain fund tracking the Indxx Bitcoin Miners Index, while CIFU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by REX. MNRS is passively managed, while CIFU is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MNRS charges 0.59%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for CIFU.

Performance

MNRS vs. CIFU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF (MNRS) and T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNRS achieves a 58.97% return, which is significantly lower than CIFU's 94.41% return.

MNRS

• 1D: -1.39%
• 1M: 4.95%
• YTD: 58.97%
• 6M: 47.48%
• 1Y: 126.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CIFU

• 1D: -4.06%
• 1M: 42.63%
• YTD: 94.41%
• 6M: 64.26%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNRS vs. CIFU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MNRS Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF	58.97%	-2.73%
CIFU T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF	94.41%	-13.41%

Correlation

The correlation between MNRS and CIFU is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025	0.89

Return for Risk

MNRS vs. CIFU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNRS

MNRS Risk / Return Rank: 47
MNRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
MNRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
MNRS Omega Ratio Rank: 46
MNRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
MNRS Martin Ratio Rank: 31

CIFU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNRS vs. CIFU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF (MNRS) and T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MNRS	CIFU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.30	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.24	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.35	—	—

Drawdowns

MNRS vs. CIFU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNRS drawdown since its inception was -56.70%, smaller than the maximum CIFU drawdown of -77.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNRS and CIFU.

Drawdown Indicators

	MNRS	CIFU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.70%	-77.20%	+20.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.37%	-10.48%	-1.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.35%	-42.93%	+19.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.12%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MNRS	CIFU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.99%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	52.71%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	71.27%	207.07%	-135.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	70.71%	207.07%	-136.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	70.71%	207.07%	-136.36%

MNRS vs. CIFU - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNRS has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than CIFU's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

MNRS vs. CIFU - Dividend Comparison

MNRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, while CIFU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
CIFU T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%
MNRS Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF	0.34%	0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MNRS and CIFU in my portfolio?

MNRS and CIFU have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MNRS or CIFU?

On fees, MNRS is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MNRS or CIFU?

MNRS is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CIFU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MNRS or CIFU?

MNRS has the higher dividend yield at 0.34%, compared with 0.00% for CIFU.

What is the main difference between MNRS and CIFU?

MNRS is categorized as Blockchain, while CIFU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MNRS and 1.50% for CIFU.