MNHYX vs. LCORX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series (MNHYX) and Leuthold Core Investment Fund (LCORX).
MNHYX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Sep 14, 2009. LCORX is managed by Leuthold. It was launched on Nov 19, 1995.
Performance
MNHYX vs. LCORX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MNHYX vs. LCORX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNHYX Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series | -1.11% | 6.65% | 9.63% | 13.19% | -7.59% | 9.99% | 6.26% | 13.99% | -1.30% | 8.49% |
LCORX Leuthold Core Investment Fund | -1.25% | 14.39% | 8.01% | 11.71% | -6.78% | 15.19% | 10.08% | 11.58% | -6.23% | 15.79% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNHYX achieves a -1.11% return, which is significantly higher than LCORX's -1.25% return. Over the past 10 years, MNHYX has underperformed LCORX with an annualized return of 6.59%, while LCORX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.20% annualized return.
MNHYX
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -1.86%
- YTD
- -1.11%
- 6M
- 0.19%
- 1Y
- 4.70%
- 3Y*
- 8.57%
- 5Y*
- 5.31%
- 10Y*
- 6.59%
LCORX
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- -6.23%
- YTD
- -1.25%
- 6M
- -0.97%
- 1Y
- 13.85%
- 3Y*
- 10.40%
- 5Y*
- 6.64%
- 10Y*
- 7.20%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MNHYX vs. LCORX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNHYX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than LCORX's 1.16% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MNHYX vs. LCORX — Risk / Return Rank
MNHYX
LCORX
MNHYX vs. LCORX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series (MNHYX) and Leuthold Core Investment Fund (LCORX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MNHYX | LCORX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.24 | 1.53 | -0.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.64 | 2.13 | -0.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.29 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.23 | 1.97 | -0.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.86 | 7.72 | -2.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MNHYX | LCORX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | 1.53 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.46 | 0.73 | +0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.59 | 0.75 | +0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.79 | 0.71 | +1.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between MNHYX and LCORX is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MNHYX vs. LCORX - Dividend Comparison
MNHYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.93%, less than LCORX's 8.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNHYX Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series | 6.93% | 6.95% | 6.38% | 6.66% | 5.93% | 7.93% | 4.98% | 6.63% | 5.26% | 5.16% | 6.49% | 5.60% |
LCORX Leuthold Core Investment Fund | 8.06% | 7.93% | 7.03% | 5.57% | 7.20% | 5.00% | 0.24% | 1.89% | 10.74% | 3.22% | 0.45% | 3.94% |
Drawdowns
MNHYX vs. LCORX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNHYX drawdown since its inception was -19.70%, smaller than the maximum LCORX drawdown of -41.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNHYX and LCORX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNHYX | LCORX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.70% | -41.31% | +21.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.38% | -6.55% | +3.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.84% | -13.88% | +3.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.70% | -19.38% | -0.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.20% | -6.51% | +4.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.57% | -5.03% | +3.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.86% | 1.67% | -0.81% |
Volatility
MNHYX vs. LCORX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series (MNHYX) is 1.50%, while Leuthold Core Investment Fund (LCORX) has a volatility of 3.45%. This indicates that MNHYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LCORX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MNHYX | LCORX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.50% | 3.45% | -1.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.06% | 6.50% | -4.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.66% | 9.19% | -5.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.66% | 9.18% | -5.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.15% | 9.62% | -5.47% |