LCORX vs. GRZZX
LCORX (Leuthold Core Investment Fund) and GRZZX (Grizzly Short Fund) are both mutual funds - LCORX is a Tactical Allocation fund managed by Leuthold, while GRZZX is a Inverse Equities fund managed by Leuthold. Over the past 10 years, LCORX returned 7.81%/yr vs -0.96%/yr for GRZZX. At a correlation of -0.77, they often move in opposite directions. LCORX charges 1.16%/yr vs 1.61%/yr for GRZZX.
Performance
LCORX vs. GRZZX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCORX achieves a 5.51% return, which is significantly higher than GRZZX's -8.25% return. Over the past 10 years, LCORX has outperformed GRZZX with an annualized return of 7.81%, while GRZZX has yielded a comparatively lower -0.96% annualized return.
LCORX
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -1.33%
- 6M
- 3.04%
- YTD
- 5.51%
- 1Y
- 13.61%
- 3Y*
- 11.01%
- 5Y*
- 7.49%
- 10Y*
- 7.81%
GRZZX
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -1.73%
- 6M
- -4.06%
- YTD
- -8.25%
- 1Y
- -7.26%
- 3Y*
- -6.20%
- 5Y*
- -4.02%
- 10Y*
- -0.96%
LCORX vs. GRZZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCORX Leuthold Core Investment Fund | 5.51% | 14.39% | 8.01% | 11.71% | -6.78% | 15.19% | 10.08% | 11.58% | -6.23% | 15.79% |
GRZZX Grizzly Short Fund | -8.25% | -2.98% | -6.74% | -18.72% | 22.43% | -15.87% | -41.33% | -29.43% | 301.98% | -19.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCORX and GRZZX is -0.61, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2001 | -0.77 |
The correlation between LCORX and GRZZX shifts across timeframes, from -0.77 (all time) to -0.61 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCORX vs. GRZZX — Risk / Return Rank
LCORX
GRZZX
LCORX vs. GRZZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leuthold Core Investment Fund (LCORX) and Grizzly Short Fund (GRZZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LCORX | GRZZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 0.92 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | -0.49 | +2.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.89 | -1.11 | +9.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LCORX vs. GRZZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCORX drawdown since its inception was -41.31%, smaller than the maximum GRZZX drawdown of -91.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCORX and GRZZX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCORX | GRZZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.31% | -91.80% | +50.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.55% | -15.84% | +9.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.98% | -31.08% | +21.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.88% | -39.06% | +25.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.38% | -73.07% | +53.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.15% | -89.77% | +87.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.99% | -69.44% | +64.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.76% | 7.03% | -5.27% |
Volatility
LCORX vs. GRZZX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Leuthold Core Investment Fund (LCORX) is 1.93%, while Grizzly Short Fund (GRZZX) has a volatility of 3.66%. This indicates that LCORX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRZZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCORX | GRZZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.93% | 3.66% | -1.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.15% | 10.51% | -3.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.77% | 13.89% | -5.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.20% | 19.61% | -10.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.62% | 96.63% | -87.01% |
LCORX vs. GRZZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCORX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is lower than GRZZX's 1.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
LCORX vs. GRZZX - Dividend Comparison
LCORX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.57%, more than GRZZX's 4.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRZZX Grizzly Short Fund | 4.98% | 6.00% | 10.30% | 6.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LCORX Leuthold Core Investment Fund | 7.57% | 7.93% | 7.03% | 5.57% | 7.20% | 5.00% | 0.24% | 1.89% | 10.74% | 3.22% | 0.45% | 3.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LCORX and GRZZX have a correlation of -0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GRZZX has higher volatility (3.66%) compared to LCORX (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCORX dropped -41.31% vs GRZZX's -91.80%.
LCORX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LCORX and GRZZX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer