LCORX vs. RCTIX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

LCORX (Leuthold Core Investment Fund) and RCTIX (River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - LCORX is a Tactical Allocation fund managed by Leuthold, while RCTIX is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by River Canyon. Over the past 10 years, LCORX returned 7.83%/yr vs 5.53%/yr for RCTIX. Their 0.16 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. LCORX charges 1.16%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for RCTIX.

Performance

LCORX vs. RCTIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leuthold Core Investment Fund (LCORX) and River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund (RCTIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCORX achieves a 5.82% return, which is significantly higher than RCTIX's 1.55% return. Over the past 10 years, LCORX has outperformed RCTIX with an annualized return of 7.83%, while RCTIX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.53% annualized return.

LCORX

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: -0.17%
• 6M: 3.62%
• YTD: 5.82%
• 1Y: 13.89%
• 3Y*: 10.83%
• 5Y*: 7.02%
• 10Y*: 7.83%
• ALL TIME*: 8.17%

RCTIX

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 0.22%
• 6M: 1.97%
• YTD: 1.55%
• 1Y: 3.86%
• 3Y*: 7.18%
• 5Y*: 4.56%
• 10Y*: 5.53%
• ALL TIME*: 4.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LCORX Leuthold Core Investment Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
RCTIX River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

LCORX vs. RCTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LCORX Leuthold Core Investment Fund	5.82%	14.39%	8.01%	11.71%	-6.78%	15.19%	10.08%	11.58%	-6.23%	15.79%
RCTIX River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund	1.55%	7.75%	7.49%	10.02%	-4.07%	4.26%	6.42%	11.71%	1.82%	9.76%

Correlation

The correlation between LCORX and RCTIX is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.32
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.24
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.25
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015	0.16

The correlation between LCORX and RCTIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LCORX vs. RCTIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LCORX

LCORX Risk / Return Rank: 62
LCORX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
LCORX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
LCORX Omega Ratio Rank: 61
LCORX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
LCORX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

RCTIX

RCTIX Risk / Return Rank: 85
RCTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
RCTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
RCTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 82
RCTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
RCTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LCORX vs. RCTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leuthold Core Investment Fund (LCORX) and River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund (RCTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LCORX	RCTIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	1.89	-0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.23	2.79	-0.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.38	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.08	3.67	-1.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.48	12.03	-4.54

LCORX vs. RCTIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCORX Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the RCTIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCORX and RCTIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LCORX vs. RCTIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCORX drawdown since its inception was -41.31%, which is greater than RCTIX's maximum drawdown of -10.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCORX and RCTIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LCORX	RCTIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.31%	-10.89%	-30.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.55%	-1.20%	-5.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.98%	-1.48%	-8.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.88%	-6.17%	-7.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.38%	-10.89%	-8.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.86%	0.00%	-1.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.99%	-1.07%	-3.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.82%	0.37%	+1.45%

Volatility

LCORX vs. RCTIX - Volatility Comparison

Leuthold Core Investment Fund (LCORX) has a higher volatility of 2.01% compared to River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund (RCTIX) at 0.66%. This indicates that LCORX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RCTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LCORX	RCTIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.01%	0.66%	+1.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.23%	1.81%	+5.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.86%	2.34%	+6.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.18%	2.50%	+6.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.63%	3.74%	+5.89%

LCORX vs. RCTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCORX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than RCTIX's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

LCORX vs. RCTIX - Dividend Comparison

LCORX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.54%, more than RCTIX's 7.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LCORX Leuthold Core Investment Fund	7.54%	7.93%	7.03%	5.57%	7.20%	5.00%	0.24%	1.89%	10.74%	3.22%	0.45%	3.94%
RCTIX River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund	7.36%	7.31%	7.89%	8.50%	5.98%	3.02%	5.97%	4.97%	3.30%	4.89%	2.16%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LCORX and RCTIX in my portfolio?

LCORX and RCTIX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LCORX or RCTIX?

LCORX has higher volatility (2.01%) compared to RCTIX (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCORX dropped -41.31% vs RCTIX's -10.89%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RCTIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.