MNBAX vs. STDAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX) and SEI Asset Allocation Trust Defensive Strategy Allocation Fund (STDAX).
MNBAX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Oct 11, 1993. STDAX is managed by SEI. It was launched on Nov 16, 2003.
Performance
MNBAX vs. STDAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MNBAX vs. STDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series | -6.16% | 10.01% | 7.16% | 13.16% | -16.70% | 11.27% | 17.65% | 19.30% | -4.31% | 14.90% |
STDAX SEI Asset Allocation Trust Defensive Strategy Allocation Fund | 0.36% | 4.46% | 5.35% | 4.45% | -1.58% | 1.56% | -19.54% | 19.83% | -3.32% | 9.70% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNBAX achieves a -6.16% return, which is significantly lower than STDAX's 0.36% return. Over the past 10 years, MNBAX has outperformed STDAX with an annualized return of 6.19%, while STDAX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.52% annualized return.
MNBAX
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -6.99%
- YTD
- -6.16%
- 6M
- -3.55%
- 1Y
- 3.07%
- 3Y*
- 5.83%
- 5Y*
- 2.51%
- 10Y*
- 6.19%
STDAX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 1.30%
- 1Y
- 3.90%
- 3Y*
- 4.41%
- 5Y*
- 2.77%
- 10Y*
- 2.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MNBAX vs. STDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNBAX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than STDAX's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MNBAX vs. STDAX — Risk / Return Rank
MNBAX
STDAX
MNBAX vs. STDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX) and SEI Asset Allocation Trust Defensive Strategy Allocation Fund (STDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MNBAX | STDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.30 | 4.24 | -3.94 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.50 | 7.10 | -6.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 2.50 | -1.44 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.25 | 6.50 | -6.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.05 | 31.36 | -30.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MNBAX | STDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 | 4.24 | -3.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 1.42 | -1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.38 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | -0.00 | +0.45 |
Correlation
The correlation between MNBAX and STDAX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MNBAX vs. STDAX - Dividend Comparison
MNBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.81%, more than STDAX's 4.47% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series | 10.81% | 10.14% | 4.23% | 1.81% | 3.68% | 5.12% | 6.49% | 4.49% | 5.73% | 6.53% | 1.15% | 2.05% |
STDAX SEI Asset Allocation Trust Defensive Strategy Allocation Fund | 4.47% | 4.49% | 4.97% | 4.77% | 3.54% | 0.87% | 1.71% | 5.19% | 8.53% | 6.92% | 10.19% | 3.84% |
Drawdowns
MNBAX vs. STDAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNBAX drawdown since its inception was -39.62%, smaller than the maximum STDAX drawdown of -76.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNBAX and STDAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNBAX | STDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.62% | -76.81% | +37.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.23% | -0.59% | -8.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.95% | -2.91% | -19.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.95% | -26.89% | +4.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.87% | -9.55% | +0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.68% | -31.95% | +25.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.17% | 0.12% | +2.05% |
Volatility
MNBAX vs. STDAX - Volatility Comparison
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX) has a higher volatility of 3.40% compared to SEI Asset Allocation Trust Defensive Strategy Allocation Fund (STDAX) at 0.39%. This indicates that MNBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STDAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MNBAX | STDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.40% | 0.39% | +3.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.27% | 0.64% | +5.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.29% | 0.93% | +9.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.38% | 1.95% | +7.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.66% | 6.69% | +2.97% |