MNBAX vs. SIFAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX).
MNBAX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Oct 11, 1993. SIFAX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Apr 8, 2012.
Performance
MNBAX vs. SIFAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MNBAX vs. SIFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series | -4.33% | 10.01% | 7.16% | 13.16% | -16.70% | 11.27% | 17.65% | 19.30% | -4.31% | 14.90% |
SIFAX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund | 8.96% | 7.82% | 4.08% | -1.74% | 8.48% | 10.83% | -1.59% | 5.68% | -3.64% | -1.96% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNBAX achieves a -4.33% return, which is significantly lower than SIFAX's 8.96% return. Over the past 10 years, MNBAX has outperformed SIFAX with an annualized return of 6.40%, while SIFAX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.91% annualized return.
MNBAX
- 1D
- 1.95%
- 1M
- -4.78%
- YTD
- -4.33%
- 6M
- -2.10%
- 1Y
- 4.75%
- 3Y*
- 6.52%
- 5Y*
- 2.69%
- 10Y*
- 6.40%
SIFAX
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 1.77%
- YTD
- 8.96%
- 6M
- 10.57%
- 1Y
- 10.85%
- 3Y*
- 7.16%
- 5Y*
- 6.83%
- 10Y*
- 3.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MNBAX vs. SIFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNBAX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than SIFAX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MNBAX vs. SIFAX — Risk / Return Rank
MNBAX
SIFAX
MNBAX vs. SIFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MNBAX | SIFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.49 | 2.03 | -1.55 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.77 | 2.86 | -2.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.40 | -0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.55 | 3.49 | -2.94 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.29 | 8.92 | -6.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MNBAX | SIFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 | 2.03 | -1.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 1.25 | -0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.76 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.36 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between MNBAX and SIFAX is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MNBAX vs. SIFAX - Dividend Comparison
MNBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.60%, more than SIFAX's 4.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series | 10.60% | 10.14% | 4.23% | 1.81% | 3.68% | 5.12% | 6.49% | 4.49% | 5.73% | 6.53% | 1.15% | 2.05% |
SIFAX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund | 4.18% | 4.55% | 3.25% | 3.82% | 11.90% | 7.89% | 1.45% | 1.49% | 1.90% | 1.39% | 1.15% | 0.48% |
Drawdowns
MNBAX vs. SIFAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNBAX drawdown since its inception was -39.62%, which is greater than SIFAX's maximum drawdown of -23.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNBAX and SIFAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNBAX | SIFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.62% | -23.62% | -16.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.23% | -3.07% | -6.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.95% | -8.32% | -13.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.95% | -14.69% | -7.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.10% | -0.35% | -6.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.68% | -8.65% | +1.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 1.25% | +0.97% |
Volatility
MNBAX vs. SIFAX - Volatility Comparison
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX) has a higher volatility of 4.08% compared to SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX) at 2.04%. This indicates that MNBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MNBAX | SIFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.08% | 2.04% | +2.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.55% | 3.93% | +2.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.45% | 5.30% | +5.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.42% | 5.50% | +3.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.68% | 5.16% | +4.52% |